The intentional and spontaneous social motor synchrony of pre‐school autistic children: Evidence from fNIRS hyperscanning and machine learning

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaiyun Li, Caiyan Zheng, Yue Yang, Bang Du, Yaou Zhao, Yuehui Chen, Junqi Liu, Jiaxin Cai, Wenjing Cheng, Kezhen Lv, Liu Chen, Fanlu Jia, Shuhua Su, Wanzhi Tang
Formato: Artículo Open Access
Publicado: Wiley 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1867018389167276032
author Kaiyun Li
Caiyan Zheng
Yue Yang
Bang Du
Yaou Zhao
Yuehui Chen
Junqi Liu
Jiaxin Cai
Wenjing Cheng
Kezhen Lv
Liu Chen
Fanlu Jia
Shuhua Su
Wanzhi Tang
author_facet Kaiyun Li
Caiyan Zheng
Yue Yang
Bang Du
Yaou Zhao
Yuehui Chen
Junqi Liu
Jiaxin Cai
Wenjing Cheng
Kezhen Lv
Liu Chen
Fanlu Jia
Shuhua Su
Wanzhi Tang
Kaiyun Li
Caiyan Zheng
Yue Yang
Bang Du
Yaou Zhao
Yuehui Chen
Junqi Liu
Jiaxin Cai
Wenjing Cheng
Kezhen Lv
Liu Chen
Fanlu Jia
Shuhua Su
Wanzhi Tang
collection Wiley Open Access
contents The intentional and spontaneous social motor synchrony of pre‐school autistic children: Evidence from fNIRS hyperscanning and machine learning Kaiyun Li Caiyan Zheng Yue Yang Bang Du Yaou Zhao Yuehui Chen Junqi Liu Jiaxin Cai Wenjing Cheng Kezhen Lv Liu Chen Fanlu Jia Shuhua Su Wanzhi Tang Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry Background Social motor synchrony is critical for successful social interaction. It remains unclear whether autistic children exhibit distinct differences in intentional versus spontaneous social motor synchrony, as well as what underlying interpersonal neural synchrony ( INS ) mechanisms drive these potential differences. Method Fifty‐four children (28 autistic) completed intentional (a delayed and synchronous imitation tasks in EX1 ) and spontaneous (a rhythmic hand‐clapping task in EX2 ) tasks with an adult. Brain signals were collected by a portable multichannel fNIRS device and classified by GaussianNB machine learning approach. Results Compared with non‐autistic children, autistic children showed: (1) significantly lower behavioral synchrony across both two experiments; (2) reduced activation in the right temporoparietal junction (r‐ TPJ , CH18 ) during Ex1, with no significant group differences in activation observed across all 20 fNIRS channels during Ex2; (3) significantly lower INS values in task‐specific brain regions, that left inferior parietal lobule (l‐ IPL , CH3 ) in the delayed imitation condition in EX1 ; left inferior frontal gyrus (l‐ IFG , CH2 ), l‐ IPL ( CH9 ), and r‐ TPJ ( CH18 ) in the synchronous imitation condition in Ex1, and in the IPL ( CH8 , CH10 ‐14) and r‐ TPJ ( CH18 ) in Ex2. The GaussianNB model successfully discriminated between autistic and non‐autistic children using task‐related INS values, with classification accuracy varying by task condition, reaching 55.56% in the delayed imitation condition of EX1 , 57.41% in the time‐lag analysis condition of EX1 , 64.81% in the synchronous imitation condition of EX1 , and 74.07% in Ex2. Notably, the SHAP toolkit identified key channels driving group distinction—and these channels fully overlapped with the statistically significant INS channels identified in the analyses. Conclusions Autistic children exhibit differences in both intentional and spontaneous social motor synchrony, and these differences are linked to reduced INS in key social cognitive brain regions ( IFG , IPL , TPJ ). This research advances understanding of social functioning variations in autistic individuals and provides a foundational foundation for developing INS ‐based diagnostic tools. 10.1111/jcpp.70079 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jcpp.70079
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_jcpp_70079
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle The intentional and spontaneous social motor synchrony of pre‐school autistic children: Evidence from fNIRS hyperscanning and machine learning
Kaiyun Li
Caiyan Zheng
Yue Yang
Bang Du
Yaou Zhao
Yuehui Chen
Junqi Liu
Jiaxin Cai
Wenjing Cheng
Kezhen Lv
Liu Chen
Fanlu Jia
Shuhua Su
Wanzhi Tang
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
The intentional and spontaneous social motor synchrony of pre‐school autistic children: Evidence from fNIRS hyperscanning and machine learning Kaiyun Li Caiyan Zheng Yue Yang Bang Du Yaou Zhao Yuehui Chen Junqi Liu Jiaxin Cai Wenjing Cheng Kezhen Lv Liu Chen Fanlu Jia Shuhua Su Wanzhi Tang Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry Background Social motor synchrony is critical for successful social interaction. It remains unclear whether autistic children exhibit distinct differences in intentional versus spontaneous social motor synchrony, as well as what underlying interpersonal neural synchrony ( INS ) mechanisms drive these potential differences. Method Fifty‐four children (28 autistic) completed intentional (a delayed and synchronous imitation tasks in EX1 ) and spontaneous (a rhythmic hand‐clapping task in EX2 ) tasks with an adult. Brain signals were collected by a portable multichannel fNIRS device and classified by GaussianNB machine learning approach. Results Compared with non‐autistic children, autistic children showed: (1) significantly lower behavioral synchrony across both two experiments; (2) reduced activation in the right temporoparietal junction (r‐ TPJ , CH18 ) during Ex1, with no significant group differences in activation observed across all 20 fNIRS channels during Ex2; (3) significantly lower INS values in task‐specific brain regions, that left inferior parietal lobule (l‐ IPL , CH3 ) in the delayed imitation condition in EX1 ; left inferior frontal gyrus (l‐ IFG , CH2 ), l‐ IPL ( CH9 ), and r‐ TPJ ( CH18 ) in the synchronous imitation condition in Ex1, and in the IPL ( CH8 , CH10 ‐14) and r‐ TPJ ( CH18 ) in Ex2. The GaussianNB model successfully discriminated between autistic and non‐autistic children using task‐related INS values, with classification accuracy varying by task condition, reaching 55.56% in the delayed imitation condition of EX1 , 57.41% in the time‐lag analysis condition of EX1 , 64.81% in the synchronous imitation condition of EX1 , and 74.07% in Ex2. Notably, the SHAP toolkit identified key channels driving group distinction—and these channels fully overlapped with the statistically significant INS channels identified in the analyses. Conclusions Autistic children exhibit differences in both intentional and spontaneous social motor synchrony, and these differences are linked to reduced INS in key social cognitive brain regions ( IFG , IPL , TPJ ). This research advances understanding of social functioning variations in autistic individuals and provides a foundational foundation for developing INS ‐based diagnostic tools. 10.1111/jcpp.70079 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title The intentional and spontaneous social motor synchrony of pre‐school autistic children: Evidence from fNIRS hyperscanning and machine learning
topic Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
url https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpp.70079