Conduct disorder with limited prosocial emotions: a multimethod study in criminal justice‐involved boys

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olivier F. Colins, Thomas Cassart, Emmely Delamillieure, Kostas A. Fanti, Melina Nicole Kyranides, Maria Sikki, Maria Petridou, Paul H.F. Meens
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867004653882834944
author Olivier F. Colins
Thomas Cassart
Emmely Delamillieure
Kostas A. Fanti
Melina Nicole Kyranides
Maria Sikki
Maria Petridou
Paul H.F. Meens
author_facet Olivier F. Colins
Thomas Cassart
Emmely Delamillieure
Kostas A. Fanti
Melina Nicole Kyranides
Maria Sikki
Maria Petridou
Paul H.F. Meens
Olivier F. Colins
Thomas Cassart
Emmely Delamillieure
Kostas A. Fanti
Melina Nicole Kyranides
Maria Sikki
Maria Petridou
Paul H.F. Meens
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Conduct disorder with limited prosocial emotions: a multimethod study in criminal justice‐involved boys Olivier F. Colins Thomas Cassart Emmely Delamillieure Kostas A. Fanti Melina Nicole Kyranides Maria Sikki Maria Petridou Paul H.F. Meens Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry Background More than 10 years after its introduction in DSM‐5, support for the ‘limited prosocial emotions’ specifier (LPE) for the diagnosis of conduct disorder (CD) remains scarce, possibly because studies failed to comprehensively assess the specifier and to include important characteristics. This study was designed to tackle both major limitations. Methods In a sample of 323 criminal justice‐involved male adolescents (ages 16–17 years), diagnostic interviews were used to differentiate between males who meet criteria for both CD and the DSM‐5 specifier (CD + LPE) and males who only meet criteria for CD (CD Only). Individual and environmental characteristics were measured by means of questionnaires and computerized tasks. Results The CD + LPE (vs. CD Only) group exhibited higher levels of aggression, delay discounting, and boldness, was more likely to be expelled from school, and had significantly more delinquent friends. Levels of treatment engagement and empathy also were lower in the CD + LPE group. The DSM‐5 LPE specifier significantly added to the prediction of various of these characteristics beyond indices of CD severity (i.e., total number of CD symptoms and childhood‐onset CD) and features of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder. However, no significant group differences emerged for other characteristics (e.g., emotion recognition accuracy, anxiety, sensation seeking, response inhibition, and warm parenting). Conclusions Findings provide important and novel evidence to support the utility of the DSM‐5 LPE specifier for CD. Some findings were unexpected, though, underscoring the need to replicate and extend the current results when testing the viability of this specifier. 10.1111/jcpp.70118 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jcpp.70118
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_jcpp_70118
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Conduct disorder with limited prosocial emotions: a multimethod study in criminal justice‐involved boys
Olivier F. Colins
Thomas Cassart
Emmely Delamillieure
Kostas A. Fanti
Melina Nicole Kyranides
Maria Sikki
Maria Petridou
Paul H.F. Meens
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Conduct disorder with limited prosocial emotions: a multimethod study in criminal justice‐involved boys Olivier F. Colins Thomas Cassart Emmely Delamillieure Kostas A. Fanti Melina Nicole Kyranides Maria Sikki Maria Petridou Paul H.F. Meens Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry Background More than 10 years after its introduction in DSM‐5, support for the ‘limited prosocial emotions’ specifier (LPE) for the diagnosis of conduct disorder (CD) remains scarce, possibly because studies failed to comprehensively assess the specifier and to include important characteristics. This study was designed to tackle both major limitations. Methods In a sample of 323 criminal justice‐involved male adolescents (ages 16–17 years), diagnostic interviews were used to differentiate between males who meet criteria for both CD and the DSM‐5 specifier (CD + LPE) and males who only meet criteria for CD (CD Only). Individual and environmental characteristics were measured by means of questionnaires and computerized tasks. Results The CD + LPE (vs. CD Only) group exhibited higher levels of aggression, delay discounting, and boldness, was more likely to be expelled from school, and had significantly more delinquent friends. Levels of treatment engagement and empathy also were lower in the CD + LPE group. The DSM‐5 LPE specifier significantly added to the prediction of various of these characteristics beyond indices of CD severity (i.e., total number of CD symptoms and childhood‐onset CD) and features of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder. However, no significant group differences emerged for other characteristics (e.g., emotion recognition accuracy, anxiety, sensation seeking, response inhibition, and warm parenting). Conclusions Findings provide important and novel evidence to support the utility of the DSM‐5 LPE specifier for CD. Some findings were unexpected, though, underscoring the need to replicate and extend the current results when testing the viability of this specifier. 10.1111/jcpp.70118 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Conduct disorder with limited prosocial emotions: a multimethod study in criminal justice‐involved boys
topic Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
url https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpp.70118