Skip to content
Descubridor Institucional UMAR
Inicio
Búsqueda avanzada
Explorar
Inicio
Búsqueda avanzada
Explorar
Login
Language
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
All Fields
Title
Author
Subject
Call Number
ISBN/ISSN
Tag
Find
Advanced
Response to “Letter to Human‐written versus ChatGPT‐generated case reports”
Response to “Letter to Human‐written versus ChatGPT‐generated case reports”
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author:
Shigeki Matsubara
Format:
Artículo Open Access
Published:
Wiley
2025
Subjects:
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
Online Access:
Acceder al recurso
Tags:
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Cite this
Text this
Email this
Print
Export Record
Export to RefWorks
Export to EndNoteWeb
Export to EndNote
Save to List
Permanent link
Holdings
Description
Comments
Similar Items
Staff View
Internet
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16240
Similar Items
Response to “Re: ‘Letters generated by ChatGPT: Author who?’”
by: Shigeki Matsubara
Published: (2024)
Letters generated by ChatGPT: Author who?
by: Shigeki Matsubara
Published: (2024)
Letter to “Humans‐written versus ChatGPT‐generated case reports”
by: Amnuay Kleebayooon, et al.
Published: (2024)
Letter to Humans‐written versus ChatGPT‐generated case reports
by: Shunsuke Koga, et al.
Published: (2024)
What's the difference between human‐written manuscripts versus ChatGPT‐generated manuscripts involving “human touch”?
by: Shigeki Matsubara, et al.
Published: (2025)