Corticospinal Tract Injury Leads to Poor Motor Recovery Immediately After Ischemic Stroke

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhib Khan, Leo Gallagher, Laurel Packard, Jessica Parker, Dave Chesla, Gabe Heredia
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867002036317323264
author Muhib Khan
Leo Gallagher
Laurel Packard
Jessica Parker
Dave Chesla
Gabe Heredia
author_facet Muhib Khan
Leo Gallagher
Laurel Packard
Jessica Parker
Dave Chesla
Gabe Heredia
Muhib Khan
Leo Gallagher
Laurel Packard
Jessica Parker
Dave Chesla
Gabe Heredia
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Corticospinal Tract Injury Leads to Poor Motor Recovery Immediately After Ischemic Stroke Muhib Khan Leo Gallagher Laurel Packard Jessica Parker Dave Chesla Gabe Heredia Journal of Neuroimaging ABSTRACT Background and Purpose Corticospinal tract (CST) integrity is an imaging biomarker for predicting upper extremity motor recovery, but data are limited in acute ischemic stroke patients. Our study aimed to assess the impact of CST disruption on upper extremity motor recovery after acute ischemic stroke. Methods We enrolled patients with upper extremity motor deficits within 7 days of stroke onset. Patients’ clinical status was assessed for the upper extremity Fugl–Meyer assessment motor component (UE‐FM) within 7 days of stroke and at 15, 30, and 90 days. MRI with tractography was performed within 7 days of stroke. Diffusion tensor images (DTI) were processed to produce maps of fractional anisotropy (FA), apparent diffusion, axial, radial, and mean diffusivity. FA maps were used to assess CST asymmetry index (CST‐AI). Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables, two‐sample t ‐tests for normally distributed numerical data, and Wilcoxon rank sums for non‐normally distributed numeric data were used. Results A total of 21 patients were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 66 (±14) years and median baseline upper extremity motor component score (UE‐FM) of 42 (median) [range: 23, 53]. Baseline UE‐FM was not predictive of a 10‐point change at 90 days ( p  = 0.4469). CST‐AI was predictive of recovery at 15 days ( p  = 0.0373), and axial diffusivity was predictive of recovery at 90 days ( p  = 0.0402). All other imaging variables did not predict recovery. Conclusion Our data suggest that upper extremity motor recovery after acute ischemic stroke is impacted by CST integrity. Further studies are needed to validate our findings. 10.1111/jon.70095 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jon.70095
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_jon_70095
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Corticospinal Tract Injury Leads to Poor Motor Recovery Immediately After Ischemic Stroke
Muhib Khan
Leo Gallagher
Laurel Packard
Jessica Parker
Dave Chesla
Gabe Heredia
Journal of Neuroimaging
Corticospinal Tract Injury Leads to Poor Motor Recovery Immediately After Ischemic Stroke Muhib Khan Leo Gallagher Laurel Packard Jessica Parker Dave Chesla Gabe Heredia Journal of Neuroimaging ABSTRACT Background and Purpose Corticospinal tract (CST) integrity is an imaging biomarker for predicting upper extremity motor recovery, but data are limited in acute ischemic stroke patients. Our study aimed to assess the impact of CST disruption on upper extremity motor recovery after acute ischemic stroke. Methods We enrolled patients with upper extremity motor deficits within 7 days of stroke onset. Patients’ clinical status was assessed for the upper extremity Fugl–Meyer assessment motor component (UE‐FM) within 7 days of stroke and at 15, 30, and 90 days. MRI with tractography was performed within 7 days of stroke. Diffusion tensor images (DTI) were processed to produce maps of fractional anisotropy (FA), apparent diffusion, axial, radial, and mean diffusivity. FA maps were used to assess CST asymmetry index (CST‐AI). Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables, two‐sample t ‐tests for normally distributed numerical data, and Wilcoxon rank sums for non‐normally distributed numeric data were used. Results A total of 21 patients were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 66 (±14) years and median baseline upper extremity motor component score (UE‐FM) of 42 (median) [range: 23, 53]. Baseline UE‐FM was not predictive of a 10‐point change at 90 days ( p  = 0.4469). CST‐AI was predictive of recovery at 15 days ( p  = 0.0373), and axial diffusivity was predictive of recovery at 90 days ( p  = 0.0402). All other imaging variables did not predict recovery. Conclusion Our data suggest that upper extremity motor recovery after acute ischemic stroke is impacted by CST integrity. Further studies are needed to validate our findings. 10.1111/jon.70095 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Corticospinal Tract Injury Leads to Poor Motor Recovery Immediately After Ischemic Stroke
topic Journal of Neuroimaging
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.70095