Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacqueline Cunninghame, Lorelle Holland, Mari Takashima, Linda Nguyen, Abbey Diaz, Shuaijun Guo, Mitchell Dufficy, Craig F Munns, Amanda Ullman
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpc.16708
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867002194017910785
author Jacqueline Cunninghame
Lorelle Holland
Mari Takashima
Linda Nguyen
Abbey Diaz
Shuaijun Guo
Mitchell Dufficy
Craig F Munns
Amanda Ullman
author_facet Jacqueline Cunninghame
Lorelle Holland
Mari Takashima
Linda Nguyen
Abbey Diaz
Shuaijun Guo
Mitchell Dufficy
Craig F Munns
Amanda Ullman
Jacqueline Cunninghame
Lorelle Holland
Mari Takashima
Linda Nguyen
Abbey Diaz
Shuaijun Guo
Mitchell Dufficy
Craig F Munns
Amanda Ullman
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Towards equitable reporting of Indigenous status, ethnicity, language and country of birth in Australian paediatric clinical studies: A scoping review Jacqueline Cunninghame Lorelle Holland Mari Takashima Linda Nguyen Abbey Diaz Shuaijun Guo Mitchell Dufficy Craig F Munns Amanda Ullman Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health AimThis scoping review aims to expansively review the reporting of Indigenous status, ethnicity, culture, language and country of birth in Australian paediatric clinical studies.MethodsScoping review of Australian clinical studies, including randomised controlled trials, non‐randomised controlled trials, cluster randomised controlled trials and quasi‐experimental studies, with paediatric participants (<18 years) or mixed adult and paediatric participants. PubMed, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Embase databases were searched for clinical studies published 1 January 2018 to 28 November 2022.ResultsOf the 2717 studies identified in the search, 209 clinical studies were included. Overall, 131 (62.7%) clinical studies captured in this review did not report any of the variables of interest. When reported, terms used by study authors varied extensively and subsequently five study‐defined categories emerged ‘Indigenous status’, ‘race’, ‘race and ethnicity’, ‘ethnicity’, or ‘natural skin colour’. ‘Indigenous status’ was most reported (n = 37, 17.7%), followed by ‘ethnicity and/or cultural background’ (n = 15, 7.2%), ‘race and ethnicity’ (n = 4, 1.9%), race (n = 1, 0.5%) and ‘natural skin colour’ (n = 1, 0.5%). Furthermore, language used at home was reported in 27 studies (12.9%) and country of birth in 23 studies (11.0%).ConclusionsThis review demonstrated very low reporting of Indigenous status, ethnicity, culture, language and country of birth in Australian paediatric clinical studies. Poor reporting has raised concerns surrounding generalisability of findings from these trials in addition to equity. The recent international shift encompassing improved clinical trial reporting requirements, for ethnicity and race, require prompt establishment in the Australian clinical trial domain. 10.1111/jpc.16708 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jpc.16708
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_jpc_16708
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Towards equitable reporting of Indigenous status, ethnicity, language and country of birth in Australian paediatric clinical studies: A scoping review
Jacqueline Cunninghame
Lorelle Holland
Mari Takashima
Linda Nguyen
Abbey Diaz
Shuaijun Guo
Mitchell Dufficy
Craig F Munns
Amanda Ullman
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
Towards equitable reporting of Indigenous status, ethnicity, language and country of birth in Australian paediatric clinical studies: A scoping review Jacqueline Cunninghame Lorelle Holland Mari Takashima Linda Nguyen Abbey Diaz Shuaijun Guo Mitchell Dufficy Craig F Munns Amanda Ullman Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health AimThis scoping review aims to expansively review the reporting of Indigenous status, ethnicity, culture, language and country of birth in Australian paediatric clinical studies.MethodsScoping review of Australian clinical studies, including randomised controlled trials, non‐randomised controlled trials, cluster randomised controlled trials and quasi‐experimental studies, with paediatric participants (<18 years) or mixed adult and paediatric participants. PubMed, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Embase databases were searched for clinical studies published 1 January 2018 to 28 November 2022.ResultsOf the 2717 studies identified in the search, 209 clinical studies were included. Overall, 131 (62.7%) clinical studies captured in this review did not report any of the variables of interest. When reported, terms used by study authors varied extensively and subsequently five study‐defined categories emerged ‘Indigenous status’, ‘race’, ‘race and ethnicity’, ‘ethnicity’, or ‘natural skin colour’. ‘Indigenous status’ was most reported (n = 37, 17.7%), followed by ‘ethnicity and/or cultural background’ (n = 15, 7.2%), ‘race and ethnicity’ (n = 4, 1.9%), race (n = 1, 0.5%) and ‘natural skin colour’ (n = 1, 0.5%). Furthermore, language used at home was reported in 27 studies (12.9%) and country of birth in 23 studies (11.0%).ConclusionsThis review demonstrated very low reporting of Indigenous status, ethnicity, culture, language and country of birth in Australian paediatric clinical studies. Poor reporting has raised concerns surrounding generalisability of findings from these trials in addition to equity. The recent international shift encompassing improved clinical trial reporting requirements, for ethnicity and race, require prompt establishment in the Australian clinical trial domain. 10.1111/jpc.16708 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Towards equitable reporting of Indigenous status, ethnicity, language and country of birth in Australian paediatric clinical studies: A scoping review
topic Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpc.16708