Crisis talk: Absolutism versus pluralism is SLA studies. A response to Lantolf, Poehner, and Rieker (2025)

Ähnliche Einträge

• Introduction to responses to Lantolf, Poehner, and Rieker's (2025) “Crisis! Commentary on 'synergies' in second language acquisition and teaching (SLA/T) and how the field may advance” (a response to Atkinson, Michel, and Ribeiro (Eds.) (2025) MLJ special issue: “Synergies in second language acquisition and teaching (SLA/T)”)
  von: Marije Michel, et al.
  Veröffentlicht: (2026)
• Advocating theoretical plurality and methodological flexibility toward humanistic synergy in SLA/T research: A response to Lantolf, Poehner, and Rieker (2025)
  von: Yongyan Zheng, et al.
  Veröffentlicht: (2026)
• Introduction to the guest‐edited issue: Synergies in second language acquisition and teaching (SLA/T)
  von: Dwight Atkinson, et al.
  Veröffentlicht: (2025)
• On the need of pluralism and common ground in SLA
  von: Simona Pekarek Doehler, et al.
  Veröffentlicht: (2026)
• Relationality, interconnectedness, and identity: A process‐focused approach to second language acquisition and teaching (SLA/T)
  von: Dwight Atkinson, et al.
  Veröffentlicht: (2025)