Crisis talk: Absolutism versus pluralism is SLA studies. A response to Lantolf, Poehner, and Rieker (2025)

Documents similaires

• Introduction to responses to Lantolf, Poehner, and Rieker's (2025) “Crisis! Commentary on 'synergies' in second language acquisition and teaching (SLA/T) and how the field may advance” (a response to Atkinson, Michel, and Ribeiro (Eds.) (2025) MLJ special issue: “Synergies in second language acquisition and teaching (SLA/T)”)
  par: Marije Michel, et autres
  Publié: (2026)
• Advocating theoretical plurality and methodological flexibility toward humanistic synergy in SLA/T research: A response to Lantolf, Poehner, and Rieker (2025)
  par: Yongyan Zheng, et autres
  Publié: (2026)
• Introduction to the guest‐edited issue: Synergies in second language acquisition and teaching (SLA/T)
  par: Dwight Atkinson, et autres
  Publié: (2025)
• On the need of pluralism and common ground in SLA
  par: Simona Pekarek Doehler, et autres
  Publié: (2026)
• Relationality, interconnectedness, and identity: A process‐focused approach to second language acquisition and teaching (SLA/T)
  par: Dwight Atkinson, et autres
  Publié: (2025)