_version_ 1867005598089871360
author Xiaobin Pan
Yann Hautier
Jan Lepš
Shaopeng Wang
Kathryn E. Barry
Manuele Bazzichetto
Stefano Chelli
Jiří Doležal
Nico Eisenhauer
Franz Essl
Felícia M. Fischer
Oscar Godoy
Daniel Gómez‐García
Lars Götzenberger
Clara Gracia
Anaclara Guido
Lauren M. Hallett
Susan Harrison
Miao He
Andrew Hector
Pubin Hong
Forest Isbell
George A. Kowalchuk
Victor Lecegui
Xiaofei Li
Maowei Liang
Frédérique Louault
Maria Májeková
Rob Marrs
Neha Mohanbabu
Akira S. Mori
Robin J. Pakeman
Alain Paquette
Begoña Peco
Josep Peñuelas
Valério D. Pillar
Marta Rueda
Wolfgang Schmidt
Jules Segrestin
Marta Gaia Sperandii
Enrique Valencia
Vigdis Vandvik
Shengnan Wang
David Ward
Susan Wiser
Ben A. Woodcock
Chong Xu
Truman Young
Fei‐Hai Yu
Liting Zheng
Zhiwei Zhong
Francesco de Bello
author_facet Xiaobin Pan
Yann Hautier
Jan Lepš
Shaopeng Wang
Kathryn E. Barry
Manuele Bazzichetto
Stefano Chelli
Jiří Doležal
Nico Eisenhauer
Franz Essl
Felícia M. Fischer
Oscar Godoy
Daniel Gómez‐García
Lars Götzenberger
Clara Gracia
Anaclara Guido
Lauren M. Hallett
Susan Harrison
Miao He
Andrew Hector
Pubin Hong
Forest Isbell
George A. Kowalchuk
Victor Lecegui
Xiaofei Li
Maowei Liang
Frédérique Louault
Maria Májeková
Rob Marrs
Neha Mohanbabu
Akira S. Mori
Robin J. Pakeman
Alain Paquette
Begoña Peco
Josep Peñuelas
Valério D. Pillar
Marta Rueda
Wolfgang Schmidt
Jules Segrestin
Marta Gaia Sperandii
Enrique Valencia
Vigdis Vandvik
Shengnan Wang
David Ward
Susan Wiser
Ben A. Woodcock
Chong Xu
Truman Young
Fei‐Hai Yu
Liting Zheng
Zhiwei Zhong
Francesco de Bello
Xiaobin Pan
Yann Hautier
Jan Lepš
Shaopeng Wang
Kathryn E. Barry
Manuele Bazzichetto
Stefano Chelli
Jiří Doležal
Nico Eisenhauer
Franz Essl
Felícia M. Fischer
Oscar Godoy
Daniel Gómez‐García
Lars Götzenberger
Clara Gracia
Anaclara Guido
Lauren M. Hallett
Susan Harrison
Miao He
Andrew Hector
Pubin Hong
Forest Isbell
George A. Kowalchuk
Victor Lecegui
Xiaofei Li
Maowei Liang
Frédérique Louault
Maria Májeková
Rob Marrs
Neha Mohanbabu
Akira S. Mori
Robin J. Pakeman
Alain Paquette
Begoña Peco
Josep Peñuelas
Valério D. Pillar
Marta Rueda
Wolfgang Schmidt
Jules Segrestin
Marta Gaia Sperandii
Enrique Valencia
Vigdis Vandvik
Shengnan Wang
David Ward
Susan Wiser
Ben A. Woodcock
Chong Xu
Truman Young
Fei‐Hai Yu
Liting Zheng
Zhiwei Zhong
Francesco de Bello
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Reconciling links between diversity and population stability across global plant communities Xiaobin Pan Yann Hautier Jan Lepš Shaopeng Wang Kathryn E. Barry Manuele Bazzichetto Stefano Chelli Jiří Doležal Nico Eisenhauer Franz Essl Felícia M. Fischer Oscar Godoy Daniel Gómez‐García Lars Götzenberger Clara Gracia Anaclara Guido Lauren M. Hallett Susan Harrison Miao He Andrew Hector Pubin Hong Forest Isbell George A. Kowalchuk Victor Lecegui Xiaofei Li Maowei Liang Frédérique Louault Maria Májeková Rob Marrs Neha Mohanbabu Akira S. Mori Robin J. Pakeman Alain Paquette Begoña Peco Josep Peñuelas Valério D. Pillar Marta Rueda Wolfgang Schmidt Jules Segrestin Marta Gaia Sperandii Enrique Valencia Vigdis Vandvik Shengnan Wang David Ward Susan Wiser Ben A. Woodcock Chong Xu Truman Young Fei‐Hai Yu Liting Zheng Zhiwei Zhong Francesco de Bello New Phytologist Summary Maintaining ecological stability is essential for sustaining ecosystem functions and the benefits they provide to society. Ecological theory predicts that plant diversity destabilizes local populations, yet empirical studies report variable effects. We hypothesize that this discrepancy arises at least in part from differences captured by different diversity (average vs cumulative richness, i.e. the mean annual richness vs the cumulative richness across years) and stability metrics (abundance‐unweighted vs weighted mean population stability). To test this, we analyzed data from > 8000 permanent vegetation plots across biomes on five continents. We found a negative (i.e. destabilizing) diversity–stability relationship when using abundance‐weighted rather than unweighted measures of population stability, which are more influenced by dominant species. Similarly, cumulative richness – capturing total species occurrence over time and long‐term turnover – reveals a stronger destabilizing effect compared to average annual richness. Our findings reveal that, when specific metrics of diversity and stability are considered, more species and potentially the associated increase in interspecific competition tend to destabilize populations across natural ecosystems world‐wide – particularly those of dominant species. 10.1111/nph.70921 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1111/nph.70921
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_nph_70921
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Reconciling links between diversity and population stability across global plant communities
Xiaobin Pan
Yann Hautier
Jan Lepš
Shaopeng Wang
Kathryn E. Barry
Manuele Bazzichetto
Stefano Chelli
Jiří Doležal
Nico Eisenhauer
Franz Essl
Felícia M. Fischer
Oscar Godoy
Daniel Gómez‐García
Lars Götzenberger
Clara Gracia
Anaclara Guido
Lauren M. Hallett
Susan Harrison
Miao He
Andrew Hector
Pubin Hong
Forest Isbell
George A. Kowalchuk
Victor Lecegui
Xiaofei Li
Maowei Liang
Frédérique Louault
Maria Májeková
Rob Marrs
Neha Mohanbabu
Akira S. Mori
Robin J. Pakeman
Alain Paquette
Begoña Peco
Josep Peñuelas
Valério D. Pillar
Marta Rueda
Wolfgang Schmidt
Jules Segrestin
Marta Gaia Sperandii
Enrique Valencia
Vigdis Vandvik
Shengnan Wang
David Ward
Susan Wiser
Ben A. Woodcock
Chong Xu
Truman Young
Fei‐Hai Yu
Liting Zheng
Zhiwei Zhong
Francesco de Bello
New Phytologist
Reconciling links between diversity and population stability across global plant communities Xiaobin Pan Yann Hautier Jan Lepš Shaopeng Wang Kathryn E. Barry Manuele Bazzichetto Stefano Chelli Jiří Doležal Nico Eisenhauer Franz Essl Felícia M. Fischer Oscar Godoy Daniel Gómez‐García Lars Götzenberger Clara Gracia Anaclara Guido Lauren M. Hallett Susan Harrison Miao He Andrew Hector Pubin Hong Forest Isbell George A. Kowalchuk Victor Lecegui Xiaofei Li Maowei Liang Frédérique Louault Maria Májeková Rob Marrs Neha Mohanbabu Akira S. Mori Robin J. Pakeman Alain Paquette Begoña Peco Josep Peñuelas Valério D. Pillar Marta Rueda Wolfgang Schmidt Jules Segrestin Marta Gaia Sperandii Enrique Valencia Vigdis Vandvik Shengnan Wang David Ward Susan Wiser Ben A. Woodcock Chong Xu Truman Young Fei‐Hai Yu Liting Zheng Zhiwei Zhong Francesco de Bello New Phytologist Summary Maintaining ecological stability is essential for sustaining ecosystem functions and the benefits they provide to society. Ecological theory predicts that plant diversity destabilizes local populations, yet empirical studies report variable effects. We hypothesize that this discrepancy arises at least in part from differences captured by different diversity (average vs cumulative richness, i.e. the mean annual richness vs the cumulative richness across years) and stability metrics (abundance‐unweighted vs weighted mean population stability). To test this, we analyzed data from > 8000 permanent vegetation plots across biomes on five continents. We found a negative (i.e. destabilizing) diversity–stability relationship when using abundance‐weighted rather than unweighted measures of population stability, which are more influenced by dominant species. Similarly, cumulative richness – capturing total species occurrence over time and long‐term turnover – reveals a stronger destabilizing effect compared to average annual richness. Our findings reveal that, when specific metrics of diversity and stability are considered, more species and potentially the associated increase in interspecific competition tend to destabilize populations across natural ecosystems world‐wide – particularly those of dominant species. 10.1111/nph.70921 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Reconciling links between diversity and population stability across global plant communities
topic New Phytologist
url https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.70921