Accuracy of artificial intelligence‐assisted growth prediction in skeletal Class I preadolescent patients using serial lateral cephalograms for a 2‐year growth interval

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: A. Larkin, J.‐S. Kim, N. Kim, S.‐H. Baek, S. Yamada, K. Park, K. Tai, Y. Yanagi, J. H. Park
Natura: Artículo Open Access
Pubblicazione: Wiley 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1867020344158584832
author A. Larkin
J.‐S. Kim
N. Kim
S.‐H. Baek
S. Yamada
K. Park
K. Tai
Y. Yanagi
J. H. Park
author_facet A. Larkin
J.‐S. Kim
N. Kim
S.‐H. Baek
S. Yamada
K. Park
K. Tai
Y. Yanagi
J. H. Park
A. Larkin
J.‐S. Kim
N. Kim
S.‐H. Baek
S. Yamada
K. Park
K. Tai
Y. Yanagi
J. H. Park
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Accuracy of artificial intelligence‐assisted growth prediction in skeletal Class I preadolescent patients using serial lateral cephalograms for a 2‐year growth interval A. Larkin J.‐S. Kim N. Kim S.‐H. Baek S. Yamada K. Park K. Tai Y. Yanagi J. H. Park Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research AbstractObjectiveTo investigate the accuracy of artificial intelligence‐assisted growth prediction using a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm and longitudinal lateral cephalograms (Lat‐cephs).Materials and MethodsA total of 198 Japanese preadolescent children, who had skeletal Class I malocclusion and whose Lat‐cephs were available at age 8 years (T0) and 10 years (T1), were allocated into the training, validation, and test phases (n = 161, n = 17, n = 20). Orthodontists and the CNN model identified 28 hard‐tissue landmarks (HTL) and 19 soft‐tissue landmarks (STL). The mean prediction error values were defined as ‘excellent,’ ‘very good,’ ‘good,’ ‘acceptable,’ and ‘unsatisfactory’ (criteria: 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.0 mm, respectively). The degree of accurate prediction percentage (APP) was defined as ‘very high,’ ‘high,’ ‘medium,’ and ‘low’ (criteria: 90%, 70%, and 50%, respectively) according to the percentage of subjects that showed the error range within 1.5 mm.ResultsAll HTLs showed acceptable‐to‐excellent mean PE values, while the STLs Pog’, Gn’, and Me’ showed unsatisfactory values, and the rest showed good‐to‐acceptable values. Regarding the degree of APP, HTLs Ba, ramus posterior, Pm, Pog, B‐point, Me, and mandibular first molar root apex exhibited low APPs. The STLs labrale superius, lower embrasure, lower lip, point of lower profile, B′, Pog,’ Gn’ and Me’ also exhibited low APPs. The remainder of HTLs and STLs showed medium‐to‐very high APPs.ConclusionDespite the possibility of using the CNN model to predict growth, further studies are needed to improve the prediction accuracy in HTLs and STLs of the chin area. 10.1111/ocr.12764 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ocr.12764
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_ocr_12764
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Accuracy of artificial intelligence‐assisted growth prediction in skeletal Class I preadolescent patients using serial lateral cephalograms for a 2‐year growth interval
A. Larkin
J.‐S. Kim
N. Kim
S.‐H. Baek
S. Yamada
K. Park
K. Tai
Y. Yanagi
J. H. Park
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Accuracy of artificial intelligence‐assisted growth prediction in skeletal Class I preadolescent patients using serial lateral cephalograms for a 2‐year growth interval A. Larkin J.‐S. Kim N. Kim S.‐H. Baek S. Yamada K. Park K. Tai Y. Yanagi J. H. Park Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research AbstractObjectiveTo investigate the accuracy of artificial intelligence‐assisted growth prediction using a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm and longitudinal lateral cephalograms (Lat‐cephs).Materials and MethodsA total of 198 Japanese preadolescent children, who had skeletal Class I malocclusion and whose Lat‐cephs were available at age 8 years (T0) and 10 years (T1), were allocated into the training, validation, and test phases (n = 161, n = 17, n = 20). Orthodontists and the CNN model identified 28 hard‐tissue landmarks (HTL) and 19 soft‐tissue landmarks (STL). The mean prediction error values were defined as ‘excellent,’ ‘very good,’ ‘good,’ ‘acceptable,’ and ‘unsatisfactory’ (criteria: 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.0 mm, respectively). The degree of accurate prediction percentage (APP) was defined as ‘very high,’ ‘high,’ ‘medium,’ and ‘low’ (criteria: 90%, 70%, and 50%, respectively) according to the percentage of subjects that showed the error range within 1.5 mm.ResultsAll HTLs showed acceptable‐to‐excellent mean PE values, while the STLs Pog’, Gn’, and Me’ showed unsatisfactory values, and the rest showed good‐to‐acceptable values. Regarding the degree of APP, HTLs Ba, ramus posterior, Pm, Pog, B‐point, Me, and mandibular first molar root apex exhibited low APPs. The STLs labrale superius, lower embrasure, lower lip, point of lower profile, B′, Pog,’ Gn’ and Me’ also exhibited low APPs. The remainder of HTLs and STLs showed medium‐to‐very high APPs.ConclusionDespite the possibility of using the CNN model to predict growth, further studies are needed to improve the prediction accuracy in HTLs and STLs of the chin area. 10.1111/ocr.12764 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
title Accuracy of artificial intelligence‐assisted growth prediction in skeletal Class I preadolescent patients using serial lateral cephalograms for a 2‐year growth interval
topic Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12764