Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Soheil Shahbazi, Saharnaz Esmaeili, Anahita Moscowchi, Reza Amid, Georgios Romanos, Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh
Natura: Artículo Open Access
Pubblicazione: Wiley 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/php.14098
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1867010137407881216
author Soheil Shahbazi
Saharnaz Esmaeili
Anahita Moscowchi
Reza Amid
Georgios Romanos
Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh
author_facet Soheil Shahbazi
Saharnaz Esmaeili
Anahita Moscowchi
Reza Amid
Georgios Romanos
Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh
Soheil Shahbazi
Saharnaz Esmaeili
Anahita Moscowchi
Reza Amid
Georgios Romanos
Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Adjunctive photochemical therapy for management of inflammatory peri‐implant diseases: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Soheil Shahbazi Saharnaz Esmaeili Anahita Moscowchi Reza Amid Georgios Romanos Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh Photochemistry and Photobiology Abstract This study aimed to systematically review the data on interventions involving adjunctive photochemical therapy in treating peri‐implant mucositis (PIM) and peri‐implantitis (PI). The electronic search was conducted through six databases in October 2023, seeking studies relying on any kind of adjunctive photochemical therapy in treating inflammatory peri‐implant diseases (PIDs). To showcase the effect size, mean differences along with 95% confidence intervals were utilized. Forty‐seven studies were deemed eligible for qualitative synthesis, 14 of which were included in the meta‐analysis. Low‐level light therapy and photodynamic therapy led to enhanced improvements in clinical and radiographic indices, such as bone level (BL), bleeding on probing (BoP), clinical attachment level (CAL), and probing depth (PD), during the 3‐month follow‐up. However, the differences in efficacy between treatments incorporating adjunctive photochemical therapy and those relying solely on mechanical debridement, considered the gold standard, lessened over extended follow‐up periods of 6, 9, and 12 months. Significant differences were observed when comparing the treatment outcomes following adjunctive photochemical therapy between obese and smoker patients with healthy subjects. Incorporating adjunctive photochemical therapy for PID treatment might improve clinical and radiographic parameters in a short‐term follow‐up of 3 months, but longer‐term benefits appear comparable to routine treatments. 10.1111/php.14098 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/php.14098
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_php_14098
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Adjunctive photochemical therapy for management of inflammatory peri‐implant diseases: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Soheil Shahbazi
Saharnaz Esmaeili
Anahita Moscowchi
Reza Amid
Georgios Romanos
Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh
Photochemistry and Photobiology
Adjunctive photochemical therapy for management of inflammatory peri‐implant diseases: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Soheil Shahbazi Saharnaz Esmaeili Anahita Moscowchi Reza Amid Georgios Romanos Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh Photochemistry and Photobiology Abstract This study aimed to systematically review the data on interventions involving adjunctive photochemical therapy in treating peri‐implant mucositis (PIM) and peri‐implantitis (PI). The electronic search was conducted through six databases in October 2023, seeking studies relying on any kind of adjunctive photochemical therapy in treating inflammatory peri‐implant diseases (PIDs). To showcase the effect size, mean differences along with 95% confidence intervals were utilized. Forty‐seven studies were deemed eligible for qualitative synthesis, 14 of which were included in the meta‐analysis. Low‐level light therapy and photodynamic therapy led to enhanced improvements in clinical and radiographic indices, such as bone level (BL), bleeding on probing (BoP), clinical attachment level (CAL), and probing depth (PD), during the 3‐month follow‐up. However, the differences in efficacy between treatments incorporating adjunctive photochemical therapy and those relying solely on mechanical debridement, considered the gold standard, lessened over extended follow‐up periods of 6, 9, and 12 months. Significant differences were observed when comparing the treatment outcomes following adjunctive photochemical therapy between obese and smoker patients with healthy subjects. Incorporating adjunctive photochemical therapy for PID treatment might improve clinical and radiographic parameters in a short‐term follow‐up of 3 months, but longer‐term benefits appear comparable to routine treatments. 10.1111/php.14098 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Adjunctive photochemical therapy for management of inflammatory peri‐implant diseases: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Photochemistry and Photobiology
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/php.14098