Consciousness Doesn't Do That

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Matthias Michel
Format: Artículo Open Access
Publié: Wiley 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1867007693347094528
author Matthias Michel
author_facet Matthias Michel
Matthias Michel
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Consciousness Doesn't Do That Matthias Michel Philosophy and Phenomenological Research ABSTRACT The question of which mental functions require consciousness has recently come to the forefront because of its relevance for investigating animal consciousness. Finding out that an animal can perform a function associated with consciousness would count as evidence that it has conscious states. I argue that most of the empirical research interpreted as showing that some functions are associated with consciousness fails to show this. Instead, it merely shows that the relevant functions falter when based on degraded sensory signals—which is unsurprising. This issue hinders empirical research on the functions associated with consciousness. I explain how consciousness research can do better when investigating the functions that require consciousness. Until the relevant research is properly carried out, the presence of functions supposedly associated with consciousness in nonhuman animals should not convince the skeptics one bit. 10.1111/phpr.70090 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/phpr.70090
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_phpr_70090
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Consciousness Doesn't Do That
Matthias Michel
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Consciousness Doesn't Do That Matthias Michel Philosophy and Phenomenological Research ABSTRACT The question of which mental functions require consciousness has recently come to the forefront because of its relevance for investigating animal consciousness. Finding out that an animal can perform a function associated with consciousness would count as evidence that it has conscious states. I argue that most of the empirical research interpreted as showing that some functions are associated with consciousness fails to show this. Instead, it merely shows that the relevant functions falter when based on degraded sensory signals—which is unsurprising. This issue hinders empirical research on the functions associated with consciousness. I explain how consciousness research can do better when investigating the functions that require consciousness. Until the relevant research is properly carried out, the presence of functions supposedly associated with consciousness in nonhuman animals should not convince the skeptics one bit. 10.1111/phpr.70090 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Consciousness Doesn't Do That
topic Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/phpr.70090