What If You Had a Revolution and No One Came? Isolation, Intersubjectivity, and Agency in China's 2011 Jasmine Revolution

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kevin Carrico
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867013132572950528
author Kevin Carrico
author_facet Kevin Carrico
Kevin Carrico
collection Wiley Open Access
contents What If You Had a Revolution and No One Came? Isolation, Intersubjectivity, and Agency in China's 2011 Jasmine Revolution Kevin Carrico PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review ABSTRACTWhy did people join China's doomed Jasmine Revolution in 2011? And why, considering the deep motivation required to join, did they eventually stop? This ethnographic study, based on 4 months of observation of protest sites and discussions with participants, moves beyond previous research on the revolution's macropolitical failure by engaging with the micropolitical motivations of participants. The meaning of this seemingly meaningless revolution is found in the promise of social bonds of mutual recognition based on shared ideals, overcoming isolation, and bringing alternative online communities into the real world. Such yearning for social bonds as the foundation of the revolution, however, presented the Party‐state with a means to infiltrate and undermine the movement. In a paradox of self‐other relations labeled the agent effect, the unavoidable reliance on others for political agency clashes with the simultaneous inaccessibility of others’ motivations. The seemingly meaningless Jasmine Revolution is, then, in fact, deeply meaningful for understanding the meaning of anti‐regime protest in China and, more broadly, the dilemmas of the exercise of political agency. 10.1111/plar.70013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1111/plar.70013
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_plar_70013
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle What If You Had a Revolution and No One Came? Isolation, Intersubjectivity, and Agency in China's 2011 Jasmine Revolution
Kevin Carrico
PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review
What If You Had a Revolution and No One Came? Isolation, Intersubjectivity, and Agency in China's 2011 Jasmine Revolution Kevin Carrico PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review ABSTRACTWhy did people join China's doomed Jasmine Revolution in 2011? And why, considering the deep motivation required to join, did they eventually stop? This ethnographic study, based on 4 months of observation of protest sites and discussions with participants, moves beyond previous research on the revolution's macropolitical failure by engaging with the micropolitical motivations of participants. The meaning of this seemingly meaningless revolution is found in the promise of social bonds of mutual recognition based on shared ideals, overcoming isolation, and bringing alternative online communities into the real world. Such yearning for social bonds as the foundation of the revolution, however, presented the Party‐state with a means to infiltrate and undermine the movement. In a paradox of self‐other relations labeled the agent effect, the unavoidable reliance on others for political agency clashes with the simultaneous inaccessibility of others’ motivations. The seemingly meaningless Jasmine Revolution is, then, in fact, deeply meaningful for understanding the meaning of anti‐regime protest in China and, more broadly, the dilemmas of the exercise of political agency. 10.1111/plar.70013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
title What If You Had a Revolution and No One Came? Isolation, Intersubjectivity, and Agency in China's 2011 Jasmine Revolution
topic PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review
url https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/plar.70013