Investigating generalized versus case‐by‐case support for labor unions
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo Open Access |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1867011178997219328 |
|---|---|
| author | Grace Flores‐Robles Ana P. Gantman Kevin Carriere |
| author_facet | Grace Flores‐Robles Ana P. Gantman Kevin Carriere Grace Flores‐Robles Ana P. Gantman Kevin Carriere |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | Investigating generalized versus case‐by‐case support for labor unions Grace Flores‐Robles Ana P. Gantman Kevin Carriere Political Psychology Abstract Across industries, workers, and the general public, activity by and support for labor unions seems to be increasing, alongside falling membership and legislative losses. How do we make sense of these seemingly contradictory parallel trends? In four studies ( N = 996), we find that support for unions is high in the United States. However, we find that support varies based on both individual‐ and group‐level factors. Specifically, conservatism and system‐justifying ideologies are negatively related to union support, whereas structural attributions for poverty are positively related to union support. We also find left–right ideological differences in union support; conservatives are less likely to support unions overall (but are relatively more supportive of police unions) compared to liberals. In contrast, liberals are more supportive of labor unions more generally than conservatives, and are more likely to support teachers' unions than police unions. Overall, support for unions is high but not generalized; worldviews, ideology, and type of labor differentiate that support. 10.1111/pops.70113 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/pops.70113 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1111_pops_70113 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | Investigating generalized versus case‐by‐case support for labor unions Grace Flores‐Robles Ana P. Gantman Kevin Carriere Political Psychology Investigating generalized versus case‐by‐case support for labor unions Grace Flores‐Robles Ana P. Gantman Kevin Carriere Political Psychology Abstract Across industries, workers, and the general public, activity by and support for labor unions seems to be increasing, alongside falling membership and legislative losses. How do we make sense of these seemingly contradictory parallel trends? In four studies ( N = 996), we find that support for unions is high in the United States. However, we find that support varies based on both individual‐ and group‐level factors. Specifically, conservatism and system‐justifying ideologies are negatively related to union support, whereas structural attributions for poverty are positively related to union support. We also find left–right ideological differences in union support; conservatives are less likely to support unions overall (but are relatively more supportive of police unions) compared to liberals. In contrast, liberals are more supportive of labor unions more generally than conservatives, and are more likely to support teachers' unions than police unions. Overall, support for unions is high but not generalized; worldviews, ideology, and type of labor differentiate that support. 10.1111/pops.70113 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| title | Investigating generalized versus case‐by‐case support for labor unions |
| topic | Political Psychology |
| url | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pops.70113 |