Medical Student Perspectives on Abortion Education in US Osteopathic Medical School Curricula

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachel Steffes, Priya Thakur, Stephanie Cox, Charles Adams, Bradley A. Creamer, Jennifer F. Dennis
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867013368741625856
author Rachel Steffes
Priya Thakur
Stephanie Cox
Charles Adams
Bradley A. Creamer
Jennifer F. Dennis
author_facet Rachel Steffes
Priya Thakur
Stephanie Cox
Charles Adams
Bradley A. Creamer
Jennifer F. Dennis
Rachel Steffes
Priya Thakur
Stephanie Cox
Charles Adams
Bradley A. Creamer
Jennifer F. Dennis
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Medical Student Perspectives on Abortion Education in US Osteopathic Medical School Curricula Rachel Steffes Priya Thakur Stephanie Cox Charles Adams Bradley A. Creamer Jennifer F. Dennis Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health ABSTRACT Background Current understanding of reproductive health content in medical school curricula is limited. This study explores abortion education offerings of osteopathic medical students (OMS) in the United States (US). After successfully completing their training, OMS receive a doctorate in osteopathic medicine (DO) rather than a Doctor of Medicine (MD). An increasing number of students are receiving DO medical education. Methods We developed and distributed a 19‐item survey to OMS through social media and research offices at all US osteopathic medical schools. We used descriptive statistics and logistic regression models to analyze the data. Results Our survey resulted in 256 responses from 37 institutions (43% preclinical, n  = 108; 57% clinical, n  = 143). Approximately 72.1% of respondents ( n  = 137) were attending medical school in a state with limitations on abortion access. Over half (52.4%, n  = 108) of respondents indicated their school was delivering abortion and/or contraception curriculum, with fewer schools having optional training (20%, n  = 42) or no educational offerings (27%, n  = 56). Of schools offering abortion education, the most frequent content included “both abortion and contraception education” (79.2%, n  = 80); fewer reported “contraception education only” (17.8%, n  = 18) or “abortion education only” (3%, n  = 3) content. Half of respondents with optional abortion education participated, while 40.5% ( n  = 17) opted out. The most frequently reported time dedicated to abortion education was < 59 min (39.9%, n  = 75). Clinical students were significantly more satisfied ( p  = 0.0458) with the time allotted to abortion content and perceived ability ( p  = 0.0256) to provide patient education on abortion. Conclusion Clinical students reported significantly increased satisfaction with abortion education received during their training as compared to preclinical students. Despite the majority supporting abortion education, most OMS received less than 1 h of dedicated instruction highlighting expansion opportunities. 10.1111/psrh.70049 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/psrh.70049
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_psrh_70049
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Medical Student Perspectives on Abortion Education in US Osteopathic Medical School Curricula
Rachel Steffes
Priya Thakur
Stephanie Cox
Charles Adams
Bradley A. Creamer
Jennifer F. Dennis
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Medical Student Perspectives on Abortion Education in US Osteopathic Medical School Curricula Rachel Steffes Priya Thakur Stephanie Cox Charles Adams Bradley A. Creamer Jennifer F. Dennis Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health ABSTRACT Background Current understanding of reproductive health content in medical school curricula is limited. This study explores abortion education offerings of osteopathic medical students (OMS) in the United States (US). After successfully completing their training, OMS receive a doctorate in osteopathic medicine (DO) rather than a Doctor of Medicine (MD). An increasing number of students are receiving DO medical education. Methods We developed and distributed a 19‐item survey to OMS through social media and research offices at all US osteopathic medical schools. We used descriptive statistics and logistic regression models to analyze the data. Results Our survey resulted in 256 responses from 37 institutions (43% preclinical, n  = 108; 57% clinical, n  = 143). Approximately 72.1% of respondents ( n  = 137) were attending medical school in a state with limitations on abortion access. Over half (52.4%, n  = 108) of respondents indicated their school was delivering abortion and/or contraception curriculum, with fewer schools having optional training (20%, n  = 42) or no educational offerings (27%, n  = 56). Of schools offering abortion education, the most frequent content included “both abortion and contraception education” (79.2%, n  = 80); fewer reported “contraception education only” (17.8%, n  = 18) or “abortion education only” (3%, n  = 3) content. Half of respondents with optional abortion education participated, while 40.5% ( n  = 17) opted out. The most frequently reported time dedicated to abortion education was < 59 min (39.9%, n  = 75). Clinical students were significantly more satisfied ( p  = 0.0458) with the time allotted to abortion content and perceived ability ( p  = 0.0256) to provide patient education on abortion. Conclusion Clinical students reported significantly increased satisfaction with abortion education received during their training as compared to preclinical students. Despite the majority supporting abortion education, most OMS received less than 1 h of dedicated instruction highlighting expansion opportunities. 10.1111/psrh.70049 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Medical Student Perspectives on Abortion Education in US Osteopathic Medical School Curricula
topic Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/psrh.70049