Active Inference in Music Perception: Motor Engagement to Syncopation Modulates Rhythmic Prediction Error
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Artículo Open Access |
| Pubblicazione: |
Wiley
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1867017129522364416 |
|---|---|
| author | Kai Ishida Hiroshi Nittono |
| author_facet | Kai Ishida Hiroshi Nittono Kai Ishida Hiroshi Nittono |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | Active Inference in Music Perception: Motor Engagement to Syncopation Modulates Rhythmic Prediction Error Kai Ishida Hiroshi Nittono Psychophysiology ABSTRACTIn active inference, the sensory surprisal (a log‐probability of sensory data) of the prediction error between prediction and sensory input is modulated by action. The urge to move (groove) induced by syncopation, which provides metric uncertainty, can be considered a case of active inference in music perception. The present study investigated whether rhythmic prediction error is modulated by improving the precision of rhythm perception through tapping in sync with the rhythm. Thirty‐five participants listened to a rhythmic sequence while tapping the half‐note beat (tapping condition) or holding a pillow (no‐tapping condition), and electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. In both conditions, the onset of the syncopated tone was rarely earlier (timing deviant: 20%) than the standard (80%). The timing deviant elicited mismatch negativity (MMN) in both the tapping and no‐tapping conditions, reflecting a prediction error in timing. Moreover, the MMN was larger in the tapping condition than in the no‐tapping condition, which may indicate increased precision due to tapping, even when motor‐related potentials were controlled for. Neural entrainment was measured by calculating intertrial phase coherence (ITPC), which reflects oscillatory activity synchronized to stimulus frequency, and ITPC differed between the two conditions at beat‐related frequencies. These results suggest that tapping enhanced meter and beat information and reduced the sensory surprisal of syncopation, resulting in a larger precision‐weighted prediction error. These effects were not due to physiological arousal differences between conditions, as assessed by EEG power and heart rate variability. These results are discussed as evidence that bodily engagement modulates sensory prediction error within the active inference framework. 10.1111/psyp.70113 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/psyp.70113 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1111_psyp_70113 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | Active Inference in Music Perception: Motor Engagement to Syncopation Modulates Rhythmic Prediction Error Kai Ishida Hiroshi Nittono Psychophysiology Active Inference in Music Perception: Motor Engagement to Syncopation Modulates Rhythmic Prediction Error Kai Ishida Hiroshi Nittono Psychophysiology ABSTRACTIn active inference, the sensory surprisal (a log‐probability of sensory data) of the prediction error between prediction and sensory input is modulated by action. The urge to move (groove) induced by syncopation, which provides metric uncertainty, can be considered a case of active inference in music perception. The present study investigated whether rhythmic prediction error is modulated by improving the precision of rhythm perception through tapping in sync with the rhythm. Thirty‐five participants listened to a rhythmic sequence while tapping the half‐note beat (tapping condition) or holding a pillow (no‐tapping condition), and electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. In both conditions, the onset of the syncopated tone was rarely earlier (timing deviant: 20%) than the standard (80%). The timing deviant elicited mismatch negativity (MMN) in both the tapping and no‐tapping conditions, reflecting a prediction error in timing. Moreover, the MMN was larger in the tapping condition than in the no‐tapping condition, which may indicate increased precision due to tapping, even when motor‐related potentials were controlled for. Neural entrainment was measured by calculating intertrial phase coherence (ITPC), which reflects oscillatory activity synchronized to stimulus frequency, and ITPC differed between the two conditions at beat‐related frequencies. These results suggest that tapping enhanced meter and beat information and reduced the sensory surprisal of syncopation, resulting in a larger precision‐weighted prediction error. These effects were not due to physiological arousal differences between conditions, as assessed by EEG power and heart rate variability. These results are discussed as evidence that bodily engagement modulates sensory prediction error within the active inference framework. 10.1111/psyp.70113 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| title | Active Inference in Music Perception: Motor Engagement to Syncopation Modulates Rhythmic Prediction Error |
| topic | Psychophysiology |
| url | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/psyp.70113 |