Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo Open Access |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/spc3.70093 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867019905500446720 |
|---|---|
| author | Alison Jane Martingano Sara Konrath Danielle Blanch‐Hartigan Mark H. Davis Judith A. Hall Mollie A. Ruben Justin J. Sanders Rachel Schwartz |
| author_facet | Alison Jane Martingano Sara Konrath Danielle Blanch‐Hartigan Mark H. Davis Judith A. Hall Mollie A. Ruben Justin J. Sanders Rachel Schwartz Alison Jane Martingano Sara Konrath Danielle Blanch‐Hartigan Mark H. Davis Judith A. Hall Mollie A. Ruben Justin J. Sanders Rachel Schwartz |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | Seven Empathy Myths: Correcting Misconceptions About a Complex Construct Alison Jane Martingano Sara Konrath Danielle Blanch‐Hartigan Mark H. Davis Judith A. Hall Mollie A. Ruben Justin J. Sanders Rachel Schwartz Social and Personality Psychology Compass ABSTRACT The term empathy has become a buzzword in recent decades, and the concept has received both scholarly attention and has also been the focus of public interest, professional trainings, and policy initiatives. However, misconceptions about its nature persist. Our aim is to rectify these misunderstandings by highlighting claims about empathy that have been empirically refuted. We address seven myths about empathy: #1 People mean the same thing when they say “empathy,” #2 Empathy increases burnout, #3 Empathy cannot be measured, #4 Empathy comes effortlessly, #5 Empathy cannot be learned, #6 More recent generations lack empathy, #7 Women are naturally more empathic. These myths, selected due to their considerable implications, often contain a grain of truth but are usually exaggerated or misapplied, typically by generalizing findings from one narrow empathy definition to all empathy constructs. The term “empathy” is an umbrella term encompassing lower‐order constructs like compassion, personal distress, emotional congruence, perspective taking, and accurate interpersonal perception. We specify for which lower‐order empathy constructs each myth holds, for which constructs it is debunked (based on empirical evidence), and for which lower‐order constructs sufficient or consistent evidence exists to offer a conclusive verdict. We illuminate the complexities involved in discussing and studying empathy while debunking these prevalent misunderstandings. Our goal extends beyond merely refuting these myths; we strive to avert their potentially harmful impact on policies and society. 10.1111/spc3.70093 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/spc3.70093 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1111_spc3_70093 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | Seven Empathy Myths: Correcting Misconceptions About a Complex Construct Alison Jane Martingano Sara Konrath Danielle Blanch‐Hartigan Mark H. Davis Judith A. Hall Mollie A. Ruben Justin J. Sanders Rachel Schwartz Social and Personality Psychology Compass Seven Empathy Myths: Correcting Misconceptions About a Complex Construct Alison Jane Martingano Sara Konrath Danielle Blanch‐Hartigan Mark H. Davis Judith A. Hall Mollie A. Ruben Justin J. Sanders Rachel Schwartz Social and Personality Psychology Compass ABSTRACT The term empathy has become a buzzword in recent decades, and the concept has received both scholarly attention and has also been the focus of public interest, professional trainings, and policy initiatives. However, misconceptions about its nature persist. Our aim is to rectify these misunderstandings by highlighting claims about empathy that have been empirically refuted. We address seven myths about empathy: #1 People mean the same thing when they say “empathy,” #2 Empathy increases burnout, #3 Empathy cannot be measured, #4 Empathy comes effortlessly, #5 Empathy cannot be learned, #6 More recent generations lack empathy, #7 Women are naturally more empathic. These myths, selected due to their considerable implications, often contain a grain of truth but are usually exaggerated or misapplied, typically by generalizing findings from one narrow empathy definition to all empathy constructs. The term “empathy” is an umbrella term encompassing lower‐order constructs like compassion, personal distress, emotional congruence, perspective taking, and accurate interpersonal perception. We specify for which lower‐order empathy constructs each myth holds, for which constructs it is debunked (based on empirical evidence), and for which lower‐order constructs sufficient or consistent evidence exists to offer a conclusive verdict. We illuminate the complexities involved in discussing and studying empathy while debunking these prevalent misunderstandings. Our goal extends beyond merely refuting these myths; we strive to avert their potentially harmful impact on policies and society. 10.1111/spc3.70093 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| title | Seven Empathy Myths: Correcting Misconceptions About a Complex Construct |
| topic | Social and Personality Psychology Compass |
| url | https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/spc3.70093 |