The Challenges and Solutions of In‐Person Big‐Team Science

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Erin M. Buchanan, Daniel R. Cavagnaro, Bharathy Premachandra, Deborah J. Wu, Neil A. Lewis, Valerie Jones Taylor, Heather L. Urry, Patrick S. Forscher
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867011450955890688
author Erin M. Buchanan
Daniel R. Cavagnaro
Bharathy Premachandra
Deborah J. Wu
Neil A. Lewis
Valerie Jones Taylor
Heather L. Urry
Patrick S. Forscher
author_facet Erin M. Buchanan
Daniel R. Cavagnaro
Bharathy Premachandra
Deborah J. Wu
Neil A. Lewis
Valerie Jones Taylor
Heather L. Urry
Patrick S. Forscher
Erin M. Buchanan
Daniel R. Cavagnaro
Bharathy Premachandra
Deborah J. Wu
Neil A. Lewis
Valerie Jones Taylor
Heather L. Urry
Patrick S. Forscher
collection Wiley Open Access
contents The Challenges and Solutions of In‐Person Big‐Team Science Erin M. Buchanan Daniel R. Cavagnaro Bharathy Premachandra Deborah J. Wu Neil A. Lewis Valerie Jones Taylor Heather L. Urry Patrick S. Forscher Social and Personality Psychology Compass ABSTRACT Big‐Team Science (BTS) offers a powerful framework for advancing psychological research through large‐scale collaboration, yet the unique challenges of conducting in‐person BTS studies remain under‐examined. This manuscript draws on the Psychological Science Accelerator's in‐person stereotype threat study, which involved 2500+ Black undergraduate students at over 20 U.S. universities, to illustrate these challenges and solutions in action. The project focused on testing social psychological theories of stereotype threat in real‐world educational settings, a context highly relevant to social and personality psychology. We identify and analyze three central challenges in in‐person BTS: (1) balancing standardization with contextual sensitivity, (2) addressing disparities in research infrastructure, and (3) supporting coordination and sustainability at scale. While much of the PSA's work has emphasized online studies, this paper centers the logistical, ethical, and scientific issues specific to in‐person data collection. We offer concrete strategies developed during the study, including metadata documentation, flexible protocol design, adaptive assignment, and shared infrastructure, and then provide a roadmap for more inclusive and efficient future collaborations. 10.1111/spc3.70121 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/spc3.70121
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_spc3_70121
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle The Challenges and Solutions of In‐Person Big‐Team Science
Erin M. Buchanan
Daniel R. Cavagnaro
Bharathy Premachandra
Deborah J. Wu
Neil A. Lewis
Valerie Jones Taylor
Heather L. Urry
Patrick S. Forscher
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
The Challenges and Solutions of In‐Person Big‐Team Science Erin M. Buchanan Daniel R. Cavagnaro Bharathy Premachandra Deborah J. Wu Neil A. Lewis Valerie Jones Taylor Heather L. Urry Patrick S. Forscher Social and Personality Psychology Compass ABSTRACT Big‐Team Science (BTS) offers a powerful framework for advancing psychological research through large‐scale collaboration, yet the unique challenges of conducting in‐person BTS studies remain under‐examined. This manuscript draws on the Psychological Science Accelerator's in‐person stereotype threat study, which involved 2500+ Black undergraduate students at over 20 U.S. universities, to illustrate these challenges and solutions in action. The project focused on testing social psychological theories of stereotype threat in real‐world educational settings, a context highly relevant to social and personality psychology. We identify and analyze three central challenges in in‐person BTS: (1) balancing standardization with contextual sensitivity, (2) addressing disparities in research infrastructure, and (3) supporting coordination and sustainability at scale. While much of the PSA's work has emphasized online studies, this paper centers the logistical, ethical, and scientific issues specific to in‐person data collection. We offer concrete strategies developed during the study, including metadata documentation, flexible protocol design, adaptive assignment, and shared infrastructure, and then provide a roadmap for more inclusive and efficient future collaborations. 10.1111/spc3.70121 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title The Challenges and Solutions of In‐Person Big‐Team Science
topic Social and Personality Psychology Compass
url https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/spc3.70121