Evaluation of a 5‐Point Triage System for Veterinary Emergency Patients in 164 Cats and Dogs: VetTriS
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo Open Access |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867012604689383424 |
|---|---|
| author | Niels H. Groesser Lorenzo Klootwijk Laura J. Ruys |
| author_facet | Niels H. Groesser Lorenzo Klootwijk Laura J. Ruys Niels H. Groesser Lorenzo Klootwijk Laura J. Ruys |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | Evaluation of a 5‐Point Triage System for Veterinary Emergency Patients in 164 Cats and Dogs: VetTriS Niels H. Groesser Lorenzo Klootwijk Laura J. Ruys Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the applicability, reliability, and prioritization effectiveness of a 5‐point Veterinary Triage System (VetTriS) in a busy primary and secondary emergency department. Additionally, it was determined whether target waiting times could be met. Triage assessments performed by veterinary technicians and veterinary students were retrospectively assessed by the authors. Design Prospective observational study with retrospective analysis of data on applicability, reliability, and prioritization. Setting Primary and secondary emergency department. Animals One hundred sixty‐four cats and dogs presented at a primary and secondary emergency service. Interventions None. Measurements and Main Results Data from 164 dogs and cats admitted to a primary and secondary emergency department during the weekends of April to July of 2024 were analyzed. Triage performed using VetTriS by veterinary technicians and veterinary students demonstrated substantial interobserver agreement, with a kappa of 0.69. Overtriage occurred in 9.8% of patients and undertriage in 0.6%. The assigned target waiting time was met in 85.4%. VetTriS was unable to properly assess for prioritization within this study design and did not allow for good assessment of hydration status. Conclusions VetTriS is a reliable tool for use in veterinary emergency departments to triage patients and has substantial interobserver agreement. Although performing triage is difficult in a busy emergency center, the results of this study are promising. Further adjustments to VetTriS are needed, and future studies are needed to test for applicability and prioritization. 10.1111/vec.70068 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/vec.70068 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1111_vec_70068 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | Evaluation of a 5‐Point Triage System for Veterinary Emergency Patients in 164 Cats and Dogs: VetTriS Niels H. Groesser Lorenzo Klootwijk Laura J. Ruys Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Evaluation of a 5‐Point Triage System for Veterinary Emergency Patients in 164 Cats and Dogs: VetTriS Niels H. Groesser Lorenzo Klootwijk Laura J. Ruys Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the applicability, reliability, and prioritization effectiveness of a 5‐point Veterinary Triage System (VetTriS) in a busy primary and secondary emergency department. Additionally, it was determined whether target waiting times could be met. Triage assessments performed by veterinary technicians and veterinary students were retrospectively assessed by the authors. Design Prospective observational study with retrospective analysis of data on applicability, reliability, and prioritization. Setting Primary and secondary emergency department. Animals One hundred sixty‐four cats and dogs presented at a primary and secondary emergency service. Interventions None. Measurements and Main Results Data from 164 dogs and cats admitted to a primary and secondary emergency department during the weekends of April to July of 2024 were analyzed. Triage performed using VetTriS by veterinary technicians and veterinary students demonstrated substantial interobserver agreement, with a kappa of 0.69. Overtriage occurred in 9.8% of patients and undertriage in 0.6%. The assigned target waiting time was met in 85.4%. VetTriS was unable to properly assess for prioritization within this study design and did not allow for good assessment of hydration status. Conclusions VetTriS is a reliable tool for use in veterinary emergency departments to triage patients and has substantial interobserver agreement. Although performing triage is difficult in a busy emergency center, the results of this study are promising. Further adjustments to VetTriS are needed, and future studies are needed to test for applicability and prioritization. 10.1111/vec.70068 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| title | Evaluation of a 5‐Point Triage System for Veterinary Emergency Patients in 164 Cats and Dogs: VetTriS |
| topic | Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care |
| url | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.70068 |