Against AI Welfare: Care Practices Should Prioritize Living Beings Over AI

Fuente: Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dorsch, John, Goddu, Mariel, Nave, Kathryn, Vierkant, Tillmann, Coeckelbergh, Mark, Gürtler, Paula, Urban, Petr, Spang, Friderike, Moll, Maximilian
Format: Recurso digital
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901713327226880
author Dorsch, John
Goddu, Mariel
Nave, Kathryn
Vierkant, Tillmann
Coeckelbergh, Mark
Gürtler, Paula
Urban, Petr
Spang, Friderike
Moll, Maximilian
author_facet Dorsch, John
Goddu, Mariel
Nave, Kathryn
Vierkant, Tillmann
Coeckelbergh, Mark
Gürtler, Paula
Urban, Petr
Spang, Friderike
Moll, Maximilian
contents <p><span lang="EN">In this Comment, we critique the growing “AI welfare” movement and propose a novel guideline, the Precarity Guideline, to determine care entitlement. In contrast to approaches that emphasize potential for suffering, the Precarity Guideline is grounded in empirically identifiable features. The severity of ongoing humanitarian crises, biodiversity loss, climate change provide additional reasons to prioritize the needs of living beings over machine learning algorithms as candidates for care.</span></p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_1002_aaai_70016
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Against AI Welfare: Care Practices Should Prioritize Living Beings Over AI
Dorsch, John
Goddu, Mariel
Nave, Kathryn
Vierkant, Tillmann
Coeckelbergh, Mark
Gürtler, Paula
Urban, Petr
Spang, Friderike
Moll, Maximilian
AI Ethics
Environmental Ethics
Animal Ethics
AI Welfare
Precarity
<p><span lang="EN">In this Comment, we critique the growing “AI welfare” movement and propose a novel guideline, the Precarity Guideline, to determine care entitlement. In contrast to approaches that emphasize potential for suffering, the Precarity Guideline is grounded in empirically identifiable features. The severity of ongoing humanitarian crises, biodiversity loss, climate change provide additional reasons to prioritize the needs of living beings over machine learning algorithms as candidates for care.</span></p>
title Against AI Welfare: Care Practices Should Prioritize Living Beings Over AI
topic AI Ethics
Environmental Ethics
Animal Ethics
AI Welfare
Precarity
url https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.70016