A defense of Isaacson's thesis, or how to make sense of the boundaries of finite mathematics

Fuente: Zenodo
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Dopico, Pablo
Format: Recurso digital
Langue:anglais
Publié: Zenodo 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866902090994941952
author Dopico, Pablo
author_facet Dopico, Pablo
contents <p>Daniel Isaacson has advanced an epistemic notion of arithmetical truth according to which the latter is the set of truths that we grasp on the basis of our understanding of the structure of natural numbers alone. Isaacson’s thesis is then the claim that Peano Arithmetic (<strong>PA</strong>) is <em>the</em> theory of finite mathematics, in the sense that it proves all and only arithmetical truths thus understood. In this paper, we raise a challenge for the thesis and show how it can be overcome. We introduce the concept of purity for theories of arithmetic: a theory of arithmetic is pure when it only proves arithmetical truths. Then, we argue that, under Isaacson’s thesis, some <strong>PA</strong>-provable truths—including transfinite induction claims for infinite ordinals and some consistency statements—are seemingly not arithmetical in Isaacson’s sense, and hence that Isaacson’s thesis might entail the impurity of <strong>PA</strong>. Nonetheless, we conjecture that the advocate of Isaacson’s thesis can avoid this undesirable consequence: the arithmetical nature, as understood by Isaacson, of all contentious <strong>PA</strong>-provable statements can be justified. As a case study, we explore how this is done for transfinite induction claims with infinite ordinals below <span><span><span>ε0</span></span></span>. To this end, we show that the PA-proof of such claims employs exclusively resources from finite mathematics, and that ordinals below <span><span><span>ε0</span></span></span> are finitary objects despite being infinite.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_1007_s11229-024-04488-0
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2024
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle A defense of Isaacson's thesis, or how to make sense of the boundaries of finite mathematics
Dopico, Pablo
Isaacson's thesis
· Peano Arithmetic
Arithmetical truth ·
Finite mathematics
<p>Daniel Isaacson has advanced an epistemic notion of arithmetical truth according to which the latter is the set of truths that we grasp on the basis of our understanding of the structure of natural numbers alone. Isaacson’s thesis is then the claim that Peano Arithmetic (<strong>PA</strong>) is <em>the</em> theory of finite mathematics, in the sense that it proves all and only arithmetical truths thus understood. In this paper, we raise a challenge for the thesis and show how it can be overcome. We introduce the concept of purity for theories of arithmetic: a theory of arithmetic is pure when it only proves arithmetical truths. Then, we argue that, under Isaacson’s thesis, some <strong>PA</strong>-provable truths—including transfinite induction claims for infinite ordinals and some consistency statements—are seemingly not arithmetical in Isaacson’s sense, and hence that Isaacson’s thesis might entail the impurity of <strong>PA</strong>. Nonetheless, we conjecture that the advocate of Isaacson’s thesis can avoid this undesirable consequence: the arithmetical nature, as understood by Isaacson, of all contentious <strong>PA</strong>-provable statements can be justified. As a case study, we explore how this is done for transfinite induction claims with infinite ordinals below <span><span><span>ε0</span></span></span>. To this end, we show that the PA-proof of such claims employs exclusively resources from finite mathematics, and that ordinals below <span><span><span>ε0</span></span></span> are finitary objects despite being infinite.</p>
title A defense of Isaacson's thesis, or how to make sense of the boundaries of finite mathematics
topic Isaacson's thesis
· Peano Arithmetic
Arithmetical truth ·
Finite mathematics
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04488-0