Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5755943 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>This legal case study offers the most comprehensive analysis to date of systemic discrimination and administrative obstruction in Hungary's English-language medical education system. Focusing on Semmelweis University and referencing documentary evidence from Ombudsman Case EBF-AJBH-309-2025, Administrative Court Case 7. Kpk.. 750.239/2025/2, NAIH Data-Protection Case J-427-3/2025, and extensive institutional correspondence, the study shows that international FM/CV-registered students were denied compulsory anatomy practical based on unwritten, external requirements that directly contradict Semmelweis University's Study and Examination Regulations (Articles 5, 10, 11, 13, 29, 45). Evidence from works such as Administrative Obstruction in EU Medical Education, Denied Access to the Scalpel for Dissecting the Specimen, Ghost Students: The Legal Fiction of FM and CV Status, and the Cross-Border Acknowledgment series confirms that inconsistent enforcement, signature-revocation demands, and discriminatory access restrictions form a recurring administrative pattern rather than isolated errors</p>