Oreochromis aureus

Fuente: Zenodo
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Jouladeh-Roudbar, Arash, Ghanavi, Hamid Reza, Doadrio, Ignacio
Format: Recurso digital
Publié: Zenodo 2020
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866902335497699328
author Jouladeh-Roudbar, Arash
Ghanavi, Hamid Reza
Doadrio, Ignacio
author_facet Jouladeh-Roudbar, Arash
Ghanavi, Hamid Reza
Doadrio, Ignacio
contents <p><b><i>Oreochromis aureus</i> (Steindachner, 1864) – Non-native</b> (Fig. 468)</p><p><i>Chromis aureus</i> Steindachner [F.] 1864: 229; Type locality: West Africa. Lectotype: NMW 32874. Paralectotypes: (several).</p><p><i>Tilapia nilotica exul</i> Steinitz [H.] 1951: 514; Type locality: Ein Feshkha, Dead Sea. Holotype: HUJ 1209. Paratypes: HUJ 1210– 12 (3).</p><p><i>Tilapia monodi</i> Daget [J.] 1954: 344; Type locality: Diafarabé, Sudan and other localities. Syntypes: (55) MNHN 1954–0006 (1), 1960–0490 (6).</p><p><i>Tilapia lemassoni</i> Blache [J.] & Miton [F.] 1960: 217; Type locality: Lake Chad basin. Syntypes: MNHN 1959–0222 (2) Mare de Mbélé, lower Logone; CEPFL 1190 (1), 1194 (1), 1200 (1), 749–56 (8), 758–69 (12), 773–76 (4).</p><p><i>Common name</i>: Pr: Tilapi-e Abi, En: Blue tilapia, Israeli tilapia.</p><p><i>Diagnosis</i>: Males grow remarkably larger than females and possess much better developed finnage. Soft rays of dorsal and anal fin are longer in mature males, and sometimes the vermillion margin of the dorsal fin is thickened with reduced (but not closed) notches. Pelvic fins of males usually longer than those of females, reaching anus or genital papilla, and this difference is more pronounced in larger specimens, dorsal and anal fins pointed in males and rounded in females. Standard length and snout length are larger in males, while iris diameter, head length, predorsal length, prepelvic and preanal length are smaller in males. Males with one urogenital opening, females with 2 separate urinary and genital pores.</p><p><i>Meristic characters</i>: D: XVI–XIV 11–13, A: III 9–10, P: 13–14, V: 5, LS: 27–30, TV: 28–29.</p><p><i>Distribution</i>: Tigris basin (Fig. 469). Found in Karun, Arvand and Bahmanshir Rivers.</p><p><i>Taxonomy</i>: Lee et al. (1980) placed in <i>Tilapia</i>, but Krupp et al. (1989) transferred to <i>Oreochromis</i>.</p><p><i>Conservation</i>: IUCN: Not Evaluated, PC: Non-native, Not Applicable.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_12823405
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2020
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Oreochromis aureus
Jouladeh-Roudbar, Arash
Ghanavi, Hamid Reza
Doadrio, Ignacio
Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Perciformes
Cichlidae
Oreochromis
Oreochromis aureus
<p><b><i>Oreochromis aureus</i> (Steindachner, 1864) – Non-native</b> (Fig. 468)</p><p><i>Chromis aureus</i> Steindachner [F.] 1864: 229; Type locality: West Africa. Lectotype: NMW 32874. Paralectotypes: (several).</p><p><i>Tilapia nilotica exul</i> Steinitz [H.] 1951: 514; Type locality: Ein Feshkha, Dead Sea. Holotype: HUJ 1209. Paratypes: HUJ 1210– 12 (3).</p><p><i>Tilapia monodi</i> Daget [J.] 1954: 344; Type locality: Diafarabé, Sudan and other localities. Syntypes: (55) MNHN 1954–0006 (1), 1960–0490 (6).</p><p><i>Tilapia lemassoni</i> Blache [J.] & Miton [F.] 1960: 217; Type locality: Lake Chad basin. Syntypes: MNHN 1959–0222 (2) Mare de Mbélé, lower Logone; CEPFL 1190 (1), 1194 (1), 1200 (1), 749–56 (8), 758–69 (12), 773–76 (4).</p><p><i>Common name</i>: Pr: Tilapi-e Abi, En: Blue tilapia, Israeli tilapia.</p><p><i>Diagnosis</i>: Males grow remarkably larger than females and possess much better developed finnage. Soft rays of dorsal and anal fin are longer in mature males, and sometimes the vermillion margin of the dorsal fin is thickened with reduced (but not closed) notches. Pelvic fins of males usually longer than those of females, reaching anus or genital papilla, and this difference is more pronounced in larger specimens, dorsal and anal fins pointed in males and rounded in females. Standard length and snout length are larger in males, while iris diameter, head length, predorsal length, prepelvic and preanal length are smaller in males. Males with one urogenital opening, females with 2 separate urinary and genital pores.</p><p><i>Meristic characters</i>: D: XVI–XIV 11–13, A: III 9–10, P: 13–14, V: 5, LS: 27–30, TV: 28–29.</p><p><i>Distribution</i>: Tigris basin (Fig. 469). Found in Karun, Arvand and Bahmanshir Rivers.</p><p><i>Taxonomy</i>: Lee et al. (1980) placed in <i>Tilapia</i>, but Krupp et al. (1989) transferred to <i>Oreochromis</i>.</p><p><i>Conservation</i>: IUCN: Not Evaluated, PC: Non-native, Not Applicable.</p>
title Oreochromis aureus
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Perciformes
Cichlidae
Oreochromis
Oreochromis aureus
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12823405