Animal vocal sequences: not the Markov chains we thought they were

Fuente: Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kershenbaum, Arik, Bowles, Ann E., Freeberg, Todd M., Jin, Dezhe Z., Lameira, Adriano R., Bohn, Kirsten
Format: Recurso digital
Published: Zenodo 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866902309343068160
author Kershenbaum, Arik
Bowles, Ann E.
Freeberg, Todd M.
Jin, Dezhe Z.
Lameira, Adriano R.
Bohn, Kirsten
author_facet Kershenbaum, Arik
Bowles, Ann E.
Freeberg, Todd M.
Jin, Dezhe Z.
Lameira, Adriano R.
Bohn, Kirsten
contents (Uploaded by Plazi for the Bat Literature Project) Many animals produce vocal sequences that appear complex. Most researchers assume that these sequences are well characterized as Markov chains (i.e. that the probability of a particular vocal element can be calculated from the history of only a finite number of preceding elements). However, this assumption has never been explicitly tested. Furthermore, it is unclear how language could evolve in a single step from a Markovian origin, as is frequently assumed, as no intermediate forms have been found between animal communication and human language. Here, we assess whether animal taxa produce vocal sequences that are better described by Markov chains, or by non-Markovian dynamics such as the 'renewal process' (RP), characterized by a strong tendency to repeat elements. We examined vocal sequences of seven taxa: Bengalese finches Lonchura striata domestica , Carolina chickadees Poecile carolinensis , free-tailed bats Tadarida brasiliensis , rock hyraxes Procavia capensis , pilot whales Globicephala macrorhynchus , killer whales Orcinus orca and orangutans Pongo spp . The vocal systems of most of these species are more consistent with a non-Markovian RP than with the Markovian models traditionally assumed. Our data suggest that non-Markovian vocal sequences may be more common than Markov sequences, which must be taken into account when evaluating alternative hypotheses for the evolution of signalling complexity, and perhaps human language origins.
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_13447403
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2014
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Animal vocal sequences: not the Markov chains we thought they were
Kershenbaum, Arik
Bowles, Ann E.
Freeberg, Todd M.
Jin, Dezhe Z.
Lameira, Adriano R.
Bohn, Kirsten
Biodiversity
Mammalia
Chiroptera
Chordata
Animalia
bats
bat
(Uploaded by Plazi for the Bat Literature Project) Many animals produce vocal sequences that appear complex. Most researchers assume that these sequences are well characterized as Markov chains (i.e. that the probability of a particular vocal element can be calculated from the history of only a finite number of preceding elements). However, this assumption has never been explicitly tested. Furthermore, it is unclear how language could evolve in a single step from a Markovian origin, as is frequently assumed, as no intermediate forms have been found between animal communication and human language. Here, we assess whether animal taxa produce vocal sequences that are better described by Markov chains, or by non-Markovian dynamics such as the 'renewal process' (RP), characterized by a strong tendency to repeat elements. We examined vocal sequences of seven taxa: Bengalese finches Lonchura striata domestica , Carolina chickadees Poecile carolinensis , free-tailed bats Tadarida brasiliensis , rock hyraxes Procavia capensis , pilot whales Globicephala macrorhynchus , killer whales Orcinus orca and orangutans Pongo spp . The vocal systems of most of these species are more consistent with a non-Markovian RP than with the Markovian models traditionally assumed. Our data suggest that non-Markovian vocal sequences may be more common than Markov sequences, which must be taken into account when evaluating alternative hypotheses for the evolution of signalling complexity, and perhaps human language origins.
title Animal vocal sequences: not the Markov chains we thought they were
topic Biodiversity
Mammalia
Chiroptera
Chordata
Animalia
bats
bat
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13447403