Evaluating the potential of urban areas for bat conservation with citizen science data

Fuente: Zenodo
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Lewanzik, Daniel, Straka, Tanja M., Lorenz, Julia, Marggraf, Lara, Voigt-Heucke, Silke, Schumann, Anke, Brandt, Miriam, Voigt, Christian C.
Format: Recurso digital
Publié: Zenodo 2022
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866901569362984960
author Lewanzik, Daniel
Straka, Tanja M.
Lorenz, Julia
Marggraf, Lara
Voigt-Heucke, Silke
Schumann, Anke
Brandt, Miriam
Voigt, Christian C.
author_facet Lewanzik, Daniel
Straka, Tanja M.
Lorenz, Julia
Marggraf, Lara
Voigt-Heucke, Silke
Schumann, Anke
Brandt, Miriam
Voigt, Christian C.
contents (Uploaded by Plazi for the Bat Literature Project) Global change, including urbanisation, threatens many of the >1400 bat species. Nevertheless, certain areas within highly urbanised cities may be suitable to harbour bat populations. Thus, managing urban habitats could contribute to bat conservation. Here, we wanted to establish evidence-based recommendations on how to improve urban spaces for the protection of bats. In a team effort with >200 citizen scientists, we recorded bat vocalisations up to six times over the course of 2 years at each of 600 predefined sites in the Berlin metropolitan area. For each species we identified the preferred and non-preferred landscape features. Our results show that artificial light at night (ALAN) had a negative impact on all species. For soprano pipistrelles and mouse-eared bats ALAN had the largest effect sizes among all environmental predictors. Canopy cover and open water were especially important for bat species that forage along vegetation edges and for trawling bats, respectively. Occurrence probability of species foraging in open space decreased with increasing distance to water bodies. On a larger scale, impervious surfaces tended to have positive effects on some species that are specialised on foraging along edge structures. Our study constitutes an important contribution to the growing body of literature showing that despite the many negative impacts of urbanisation on wildlife, urban environments can harbour bat pop­ ulations if certain conditions are met, such as access to vegetation and water bodies and low levels of ALAN. Our findings are of high relevance for urban planners and conservationists, as they allow inferences on how to manage urban spaces in a bat-friendly way. We recommend limiting ALAN to the minimum necessary and maintaining and creating uninterrupted vegetated corridors between areas with high levels of canopy cover and water bodies, in which ALAN should be entirely avoided.
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_13451881
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2022
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Evaluating the potential of urban areas for bat conservation with citizen science data
Lewanzik, Daniel
Straka, Tanja M.
Lorenz, Julia
Marggraf, Lara
Voigt-Heucke, Silke
Schumann, Anke
Brandt, Miriam
Voigt, Christian C.
Biodiversity
Mammalia
Chiroptera
Chordata
Animalia
bats
bat
(Uploaded by Plazi for the Bat Literature Project) Global change, including urbanisation, threatens many of the >1400 bat species. Nevertheless, certain areas within highly urbanised cities may be suitable to harbour bat populations. Thus, managing urban habitats could contribute to bat conservation. Here, we wanted to establish evidence-based recommendations on how to improve urban spaces for the protection of bats. In a team effort with >200 citizen scientists, we recorded bat vocalisations up to six times over the course of 2 years at each of 600 predefined sites in the Berlin metropolitan area. For each species we identified the preferred and non-preferred landscape features. Our results show that artificial light at night (ALAN) had a negative impact on all species. For soprano pipistrelles and mouse-eared bats ALAN had the largest effect sizes among all environmental predictors. Canopy cover and open water were especially important for bat species that forage along vegetation edges and for trawling bats, respectively. Occurrence probability of species foraging in open space decreased with increasing distance to water bodies. On a larger scale, impervious surfaces tended to have positive effects on some species that are specialised on foraging along edge structures. Our study constitutes an important contribution to the growing body of literature showing that despite the many negative impacts of urbanisation on wildlife, urban environments can harbour bat pop­ ulations if certain conditions are met, such as access to vegetation and water bodies and low levels of ALAN. Our findings are of high relevance for urban planners and conservationists, as they allow inferences on how to manage urban spaces in a bat-friendly way. We recommend limiting ALAN to the minimum necessary and maintaining and creating uninterrupted vegetated corridors between areas with high levels of canopy cover and water bodies, in which ALAN should be entirely avoided.
title Evaluating the potential of urban areas for bat conservation with citizen science data
topic Biodiversity
Mammalia
Chiroptera
Chordata
Animalia
bats
bat
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13451881