_version_ 1866901608569241600
author Luis, Angela D.
Hayman, David T.S. S
O'Shea, Thomas J.
Cryan, Paul M.
Gilbert, Amy T.
Pulliam, Juliet R.C. C
Mills, James N.
Timonin, Mary E.
Willis, Craig K.R. R
Cunningham, Andrew A.
Fooks, Anthony R.
Rupprecht, Charles E.
Wood, James L.N. N
Webb, Colleen T.
O'Shea J., Thomas
Cryan, Paul M.
Gilbert, Amy T.
Pulliam, Juliet R.C. C
Mills, James N.
Timonin, Mary E.
Willis, Craig K.R. R
Cunningham, Andrew A.
Fooks, Anthony R.
Rupprecht, Charles E.
Wood, James L.N. N
Webb, Colleen T.
author_facet Luis, Angela D.
Hayman, David T.S. S
O'Shea, Thomas J.
Cryan, Paul M.
Gilbert, Amy T.
Pulliam, Juliet R.C. C
Mills, James N.
Timonin, Mary E.
Willis, Craig K.R. R
Cunningham, Andrew A.
Fooks, Anthony R.
Rupprecht, Charles E.
Wood, James L.N. N
Webb, Colleen T.
O'Shea J., Thomas
Cryan, Paul M.
Gilbert, Amy T.
Pulliam, Juliet R.C. C
Mills, James N.
Timonin, Mary E.
Willis, Craig K.R. R
Cunningham, Andrew A.
Fooks, Anthony R.
Rupprecht, Charles E.
Wood, James L.N. N
Webb, Colleen T.
contents (Uploaded by Plazi for the Bat Literature Project) Bats are the natural reservoirs of a number of high-impact viral zoonoses. We present a quantitative analysis to address the hypothesis that bats are unique in their propensity to host zoonotic viruses based on a comparison with rodents, another important host order. We found that bats indeed host more zoonotic viruses per species than rodents, and we identified life-history and ecological factors that promote zoonotic viral richness. More zoonotic viruses are hosted by species whose distributions overlap with a greater number of other species in the same taxonomic order (sympatry). Specifically in bats, there was evidence for increased zoonotic viral richness in species with smaller litters (one young), greater longevity and more litters per year. Furthermore, our results point to a new hypothesis to explain in part why bats host more zoonotic viruses per species: the stronger effect of sympatry in bats and more viruses shared between bat species suggests that interspecific transmission is more prevalent among bats than among rodents. Although bats host more zoonotic viruses per species, the total number of zoonotic viruses identified in bats (61) was lower than in rodents (68), a result of there being approximately twice the number of rodent species as bat species. Therefore, rodents should still be a serious concern as reservoirs of emerging viruses. These findings shed light on disease emergence and perpetuation mechanisms and may help lead to a predictive framework for identifying future emerging infectious virus reservoirs.
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_13537980
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2013
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle A comparison of bats and rodents as reservoirs of zoonotic viruses: are bats special?
Luis, Angela D.
Hayman, David T.S. S
O'Shea, Thomas J.
Cryan, Paul M.
Gilbert, Amy T.
Pulliam, Juliet R.C. C
Mills, James N.
Timonin, Mary E.
Willis, Craig K.R. R
Cunningham, Andrew A.
Fooks, Anthony R.
Rupprecht, Charles E.
Wood, James L.N. N
Webb, Colleen T.
O'Shea J., Thomas
Cryan, Paul M.
Gilbert, Amy T.
Pulliam, Juliet R.C. C
Mills, James N.
Timonin, Mary E.
Willis, Craig K.R. R
Cunningham, Andrew A.
Fooks, Anthony R.
Rupprecht, Charles E.
Wood, James L.N. N
Webb, Colleen T.
Animals
Bat immunology
Chiroptera
Chiroptera/*virology
Chiroptera: virology
Disease Reservoirs
Disease Reservoirs/*virology
Disease Reservoirs: virology
Genome
Genome, Viral
Host-Pathogen Interactions
Rodentia
Rodentia/*virology
Rodentia: virology
Sympatry
Viral
Virus Diseases
Virus Diseases/*transmission
Virus Diseases: transmission
Zoonoses
Zoonoses/*transmission/virology
Zoonoses: transmission
Zoonoses: virology
Biodiversity
Mammalia
Chiroptera
Chordata
Animalia
bats
bat
(Uploaded by Plazi for the Bat Literature Project) Bats are the natural reservoirs of a number of high-impact viral zoonoses. We present a quantitative analysis to address the hypothesis that bats are unique in their propensity to host zoonotic viruses based on a comparison with rodents, another important host order. We found that bats indeed host more zoonotic viruses per species than rodents, and we identified life-history and ecological factors that promote zoonotic viral richness. More zoonotic viruses are hosted by species whose distributions overlap with a greater number of other species in the same taxonomic order (sympatry). Specifically in bats, there was evidence for increased zoonotic viral richness in species with smaller litters (one young), greater longevity and more litters per year. Furthermore, our results point to a new hypothesis to explain in part why bats host more zoonotic viruses per species: the stronger effect of sympatry in bats and more viruses shared between bat species suggests that interspecific transmission is more prevalent among bats than among rodents. Although bats host more zoonotic viruses per species, the total number of zoonotic viruses identified in bats (61) was lower than in rodents (68), a result of there being approximately twice the number of rodent species as bat species. Therefore, rodents should still be a serious concern as reservoirs of emerging viruses. These findings shed light on disease emergence and perpetuation mechanisms and may help lead to a predictive framework for identifying future emerging infectious virus reservoirs.
title A comparison of bats and rodents as reservoirs of zoonotic viruses: are bats special?
topic Animals
Bat immunology
Chiroptera
Chiroptera/*virology
Chiroptera: virology
Disease Reservoirs
Disease Reservoirs/*virology
Disease Reservoirs: virology
Genome
Genome, Viral
Host-Pathogen Interactions
Rodentia
Rodentia/*virology
Rodentia: virology
Sympatry
Viral
Virus Diseases
Virus Diseases/*transmission
Virus Diseases: transmission
Zoonoses
Zoonoses/*transmission/virology
Zoonoses: transmission
Zoonoses: virology
Biodiversity
Mammalia
Chiroptera
Chordata
Animalia
bats
bat
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13537980