Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14262980 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866902179655188480 |
|---|---|
| author | Lyberger, Kelsey Loth, Dylan Delwel, Isabel Zallek, Taylor |
| author_facet | Lyberger, Kelsey Loth, Dylan Delwel, Isabel Zallek, Taylor |
| contents | <p>Identifying the biotic factors underlying invasion success into existing communities is critical to understand the dynamics of biological invasions; and while some studies suggest that intraspecific diversity may play an important role, there has not been a systematic evaluation of the evidence. We performed a meta-analysis on 37 experimental studies and 109 effect sizes to test two hypotheses: (1) higher intraspecific diversity in a resident population decreases the likelihood of it being successfully invaded by other species, and (2) higher intraspecific diversity in an invading population increases its ability to invade another species or community. We found heterogeneous effects among studies and that overall resident genetic diversity has a very small, non-significant negative effect on invasion success, while invader genetic diversity has a small, non-significant positive effect. The minimal impact of intraspecific diversity is somewhat unexpected, given the well-understood mechanisms analogous to those offered for interspecific diversity. These include sampling effects and complementarity, in which diversity is expected to maximize resource use and increase density, thereby reducing niche availability and subsequent invasibility. We recommend that future research focus on a wider diversity of organisms, include longer term experiments, and measure genetic dissimilarity to better understand the role of intraspecific diversity.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_14262980 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Intraspecific diversity poorly predicts invasibility and invasiveness in communities: A meta-analysis of experimental invasions Lyberger, Kelsey Loth, Dylan Delwel, Isabel Zallek, Taylor biological invasions Biodiversity genetic variation sampling effect complementarity Evolutionary ecology <p>Identifying the biotic factors underlying invasion success into existing communities is critical to understand the dynamics of biological invasions; and while some studies suggest that intraspecific diversity may play an important role, there has not been a systematic evaluation of the evidence. We performed a meta-analysis on 37 experimental studies and 109 effect sizes to test two hypotheses: (1) higher intraspecific diversity in a resident population decreases the likelihood of it being successfully invaded by other species, and (2) higher intraspecific diversity in an invading population increases its ability to invade another species or community. We found heterogeneous effects among studies and that overall resident genetic diversity has a very small, non-significant negative effect on invasion success, while invader genetic diversity has a small, non-significant positive effect. The minimal impact of intraspecific diversity is somewhat unexpected, given the well-understood mechanisms analogous to those offered for interspecific diversity. These include sampling effects and complementarity, in which diversity is expected to maximize resource use and increase density, thereby reducing niche availability and subsequent invasibility. We recommend that future research focus on a wider diversity of organisms, include longer term experiments, and measure genetic dissimilarity to better understand the role of intraspecific diversity.</p> |
| title | Intraspecific diversity poorly predicts invasibility and invasiveness in communities: A meta-analysis of experimental invasions |
| topic | biological invasions Biodiversity genetic variation sampling effect complementarity Evolutionary ecology |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14262980 |