Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | French |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14585431 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p><span>Can you be a lawyer, magistrate, prosecutor or judge in the judiciary and a Freemason at the same time? It's entirely possible. But there is a problem that exists with this practice. “Éric de Montgolfier, public prosecutor in Nice for ten years, insists that it is not Masonic affiliation that is embarrassing, but its use. But it places membership in a Church, a sect or a Masonic lodge on the same level. What poses a problem with a Freemason is when he does not reveal himself, because this opens the possibility of occult operations. This applies to a magistrate as well as to a lot of people.” -Freemason magistrates should reveal themselves (OBS). These judicial Freemasons who refuse to reveal themselves can commit abuses and violate the rights of others who are not Freemasons. It should be noted that Freemasons are not above the law. They must strictly respect the rule of law, like all citizens, and avoid imposing their superiority in legal matters. Otherwise, it could lead to anarchy within the judiciary.</span></p>