The Utility of Diagnostic Laparoscopy for Assessing Complex Infertility Cases: A Cross-Sectional Study on Uterine, Ovarian, and Unexplained Factors

Fuente: Zenodo
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Beena Gupta, Prabhat Kumar Bhagat
Format: Recurso digital
Langue:anglais
Publié: Zenodo 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866901352786952192
author Beena Gupta
Prabhat Kumar Bhagat
author_facet Beena Gupta
Prabhat Kumar Bhagat
contents <p><strong>Background</strong><strong>:</strong> Infertility affects a substantial percentage of couples globally, with complex cases often involving uterine, ovarian, or unexplained factors that remain challenging to diagnose accurately. Although non-invasive imaging methods such as ultrasound and hysterosalpingography (HSG) are widely used, their limitations in sensitivity and specificity underscore the need for diagnostic laparoscopy, a minimally invasive procedure with high diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to evaluate the utility of diagnostic laparoscopy in assessing complex infertility cases, specifically focusing on uterine, ovarian, and unexplained factors. <strong>Methods</strong><strong>:</strong> A cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 women presenting with either primary or secondary infertility. Each participant underwent diagnostic laparoscopy following standard clinical assessments, including ultrasonography and hormonal profiling. Data were collected on uterine anomalies, ovarian cysts, PCOD, and unexplained infertility cases, and were analyzed to compare findings between primary and secondary infertility groups. <strong>Results</strong><strong>:</strong> Uterine abnormalities, primarily fibroids, were identified in 12% of cases, mainly among primary infertility patients. Ovarian factors, including PCOD and ovarian cysts, were detected in 20% of cases across both primary and secondary infertility groups. Additionally, 12% of cases were classified as unexplained infertility due to the absence of identifiable abnormalities. Diagnostic laparoscopy provided higher detection rates for these factors compared to conventional imaging techniques, underscoring its role in cases where non-invasive methods were inconclusive. <strong>Conclusion</strong><strong>: </strong>Diagnostic laparoscopy is a valuable tool for identifying complex infertility factors, offering a reliable and safe method for comprehensive infertility evaluation. Its high diagnostic accuracy, particularly for detecting uterine, ovarian, and unexplained infertility factors, supports its use as a routine investigative procedure in infertility workups. <strong>Recommendations</strong><strong>:</strong> Laparoscopy should be considered for routine use in infertility evaluations, especially for patients with complex or unexplained infertility, to improve diagnosis and guide targeted treatment.</p> <p> </p> <div> </div>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_14588765
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2024
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle The Utility of Diagnostic Laparoscopy for Assessing Complex Infertility Cases: A Cross-Sectional Study on Uterine, Ovarian, and Unexplained Factors
Beena Gupta
Prabhat Kumar Bhagat
Diagnostic Laparoscopy, Infertility Evaluation, Uterine Factors, Ovarian Factors, Unexplained Infertility, Polycystic Ovarian Disease.
<p><strong>Background</strong><strong>:</strong> Infertility affects a substantial percentage of couples globally, with complex cases often involving uterine, ovarian, or unexplained factors that remain challenging to diagnose accurately. Although non-invasive imaging methods such as ultrasound and hysterosalpingography (HSG) are widely used, their limitations in sensitivity and specificity underscore the need for diagnostic laparoscopy, a minimally invasive procedure with high diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to evaluate the utility of diagnostic laparoscopy in assessing complex infertility cases, specifically focusing on uterine, ovarian, and unexplained factors. <strong>Methods</strong><strong>:</strong> A cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 women presenting with either primary or secondary infertility. Each participant underwent diagnostic laparoscopy following standard clinical assessments, including ultrasonography and hormonal profiling. Data were collected on uterine anomalies, ovarian cysts, PCOD, and unexplained infertility cases, and were analyzed to compare findings between primary and secondary infertility groups. <strong>Results</strong><strong>:</strong> Uterine abnormalities, primarily fibroids, were identified in 12% of cases, mainly among primary infertility patients. Ovarian factors, including PCOD and ovarian cysts, were detected in 20% of cases across both primary and secondary infertility groups. Additionally, 12% of cases were classified as unexplained infertility due to the absence of identifiable abnormalities. Diagnostic laparoscopy provided higher detection rates for these factors compared to conventional imaging techniques, underscoring its role in cases where non-invasive methods were inconclusive. <strong>Conclusion</strong><strong>: </strong>Diagnostic laparoscopy is a valuable tool for identifying complex infertility factors, offering a reliable and safe method for comprehensive infertility evaluation. Its high diagnostic accuracy, particularly for detecting uterine, ovarian, and unexplained infertility factors, supports its use as a routine investigative procedure in infertility workups. <strong>Recommendations</strong><strong>:</strong> Laparoscopy should be considered for routine use in infertility evaluations, especially for patients with complex or unexplained infertility, to improve diagnosis and guide targeted treatment.</p> <p> </p> <div> </div>
title The Utility of Diagnostic Laparoscopy for Assessing Complex Infertility Cases: A Cross-Sectional Study on Uterine, Ovarian, and Unexplained Factors
topic Diagnostic Laparoscopy, Infertility Evaluation, Uterine Factors, Ovarian Factors, Unexplained Infertility, Polycystic Ovarian Disease.
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14588765