Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bhupesh Patel, Abhilekh Tripathi
Format: Recurso digital
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14610189
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901507923771392
author Bhupesh Patel
Abhilekh Tripathi
author_facet Bhupesh Patel
Abhilekh Tripathi
contents <p><strong>Aim:</strong> To validate Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Prostate Symptoms score (SGRHPSS), versus the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) in assessing lower urinary tract symptoms in the clinical setting. <strong>Material & Methods:</strong> Male patients with age ≥ 45 years presented with lower urinary tract symptoms in OPD or admitted in wards were included. Female patients and male patients with age < 45 years were excluded. Sample size was calculated using the formula (Z²×p×q)/d²) and 560 cases of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were included. Each patient filled both IPSS and SGRH-PSS questionnaire. Each patient underwent ultrasound for prostate size, residual urine and uroflowmetry. Both scoring systems were compared, also with objective parameters of LUTS i.e., ultrasound findings for prostate size, post voided residual urine (PVRU) and uroflowmetry. <strong>Settings and Design:</strong> The study was conducted at department of Urology, Institute of Renal Sciences at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi. It was a prospective and comparative study. The study was conducted from July 2014 to March 2016. <strong>Statistical Analysis:</strong> We measured reliability of SGRHPSS using test-retest correlation coefficient 29 and Cronbach’s Alpha 29, 30 for internal consistency. All analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 20 (SPSS 20) software. <strong>Results:</strong> Total IPSS score ranged from 2 to 34 with mean score of 18, while voiding LUTS ranged from 0 to 20 with mean score of 10.89 and storage LUTS ranged from 1 to 15 with mean score of 7.12. Total SGRHPSS score ranged from 1 to 8 with mean score of 5.79, while voiding LUTS ranged from 0 to 4 with mean score of 3.0 and storage LUTS ranged from 0 to 4 with mean score of 2.79. Spearman coefficient correlation in between total IPSS score and SGRHPSS score was 0.927 (P value <0.001) and QoL in IPSS and SGRHPSS was 0.867 (P value <0.001) suggest statistically significant and strong positive relationship. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> After analysing above observations and results, we concluded that SGRHPSS score system is shorter, efficient, friendlier, and less cumbersome for patients and clinicians and may potentially replace or compliment the IPSS.</p> <p> </p> <div> </div>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_14610189
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2024
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Validation of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Prostate Symptoms Score (SGRHPSS), compared with the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) in assessing lower urinary tract symptoms in the clinical setting
Bhupesh Patel
Abhilekh Tripathi
Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Prostate Symptoms Score (SGRH-PSS), International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)
<p><strong>Aim:</strong> To validate Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Prostate Symptoms score (SGRHPSS), versus the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) in assessing lower urinary tract symptoms in the clinical setting. <strong>Material & Methods:</strong> Male patients with age ≥ 45 years presented with lower urinary tract symptoms in OPD or admitted in wards were included. Female patients and male patients with age < 45 years were excluded. Sample size was calculated using the formula (Z²×p×q)/d²) and 560 cases of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were included. Each patient filled both IPSS and SGRH-PSS questionnaire. Each patient underwent ultrasound for prostate size, residual urine and uroflowmetry. Both scoring systems were compared, also with objective parameters of LUTS i.e., ultrasound findings for prostate size, post voided residual urine (PVRU) and uroflowmetry. <strong>Settings and Design:</strong> The study was conducted at department of Urology, Institute of Renal Sciences at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi. It was a prospective and comparative study. The study was conducted from July 2014 to March 2016. <strong>Statistical Analysis:</strong> We measured reliability of SGRHPSS using test-retest correlation coefficient 29 and Cronbach’s Alpha 29, 30 for internal consistency. All analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 20 (SPSS 20) software. <strong>Results:</strong> Total IPSS score ranged from 2 to 34 with mean score of 18, while voiding LUTS ranged from 0 to 20 with mean score of 10.89 and storage LUTS ranged from 1 to 15 with mean score of 7.12. Total SGRHPSS score ranged from 1 to 8 with mean score of 5.79, while voiding LUTS ranged from 0 to 4 with mean score of 3.0 and storage LUTS ranged from 0 to 4 with mean score of 2.79. Spearman coefficient correlation in between total IPSS score and SGRHPSS score was 0.927 (P value <0.001) and QoL in IPSS and SGRHPSS was 0.867 (P value <0.001) suggest statistically significant and strong positive relationship. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> After analysing above observations and results, we concluded that SGRHPSS score system is shorter, efficient, friendlier, and less cumbersome for patients and clinicians and may potentially replace or compliment the IPSS.</p> <p> </p> <div> </div>
title Validation of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Prostate Symptoms Score (SGRHPSS), compared with the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) in assessing lower urinary tract symptoms in the clinical setting
topic Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Prostate Symptoms Score (SGRH-PSS), International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14610189