Special Relativity, Action-Reaction and Free Particle Quantum Mechanics

Fuente: Zenodo
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Ruggeri, Francesco R.
Natura: Recurso digital
Pubblicazione: Zenodo 2025
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866901252470734848
author Ruggeri, Francesco R.
author_facet Ruggeri, Francesco R.
contents <p>In (1), we suggested that the special relativistic Lorentz invariant A = -Et+px pointed towards the notion of invariance not simply across frames with different constant velocities, -v, but over all free particles. We thus suggested using dt= hbar/E and dx = hbar/p to demonstrate such an invariance, noting that -Et and px terms are independent (just as (px)x, (py)y and (pz)z terms are for a full p dot r). </p> <p>    In this note, we wish to investigate the suggestion of (1) in more detail. First, we note that for a given frame with -v, E and p are related by Ev = p (c=1) (for a particle with rest mass) and so it is difficult to see independence  between the two even though they represent different components of a 4-vector. Similarly x’=vt’ for a particle with rest mass and one again does not have independence in trajectory even though one has the 4-vector (x,ct). </p> <p>   In order to see independence between E and p, we suggest that one must consider at least two particles with different rest masses, different E values, but the same p, hence yielding the same impulse hit. This, however, suggests two different moving frames, each with a different -v and not one. We ask: How does one introduce two frames in a natural manner? We suggest that if one considers two different rest masses mo1 and mo2 at rest, one has a total p of 0, each particle has equal and opposite momentum, but different energies and there is one frame. Using the notion of action-reaction, one may suggest that if mo1 and mo2 are joined  by a spring which is released, they may achieve equal and opposite momenta (linked to two different frames with -v1, -v2) and have different energies. The two have equal momenta, but different E values which, we argue, suggests independence of p and E. This may be verified by noting that the two are associated with independent measurements (impulse hits on a target versus distance traveled in a repulsive potential, as discussed in (1)).</p> <p>  Similarly, one may have the same E for two particles, but different momenta. In such a case, a different kind of measurement (distance traveled in a repulsive field) does not distinguish between the E values. We note that the action-reaction approach is directly connected with the concept of conservation of momentum. We argue that this reasoning suggests that E and p are independent even though Ev = p (c=1) for a particle with rest mass might suggest otherwise. As a result, -Edt+p dx, should have dt=hbar/E and dx=hbar/p in order to demonstrate such independence. Otherwise, there is a correlation between the two terms and they are not independent. </p> <p>  As a result, we argue that dt=hbar/E and dx=hbar/p, i.e. free particle quantum mechanical properties, are not only linked with the special relativistic Lorentz invariant -Et+px, but also with the notion of conservation of momentum and action-reaction. Even though one may use -Et+px for a single particle, the independence of E and p is really seen through considering at least two particles at rest with different masses which break apart with equal and opposite momenta.</p> <p> </p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_14639116
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Special Relativity, Action-Reaction and Free Particle Quantum Mechanics
Ruggeri, Francesco R.
<p>In (1), we suggested that the special relativistic Lorentz invariant A = -Et+px pointed towards the notion of invariance not simply across frames with different constant velocities, -v, but over all free particles. We thus suggested using dt= hbar/E and dx = hbar/p to demonstrate such an invariance, noting that -Et and px terms are independent (just as (px)x, (py)y and (pz)z terms are for a full p dot r). </p> <p>    In this note, we wish to investigate the suggestion of (1) in more detail. First, we note that for a given frame with -v, E and p are related by Ev = p (c=1) (for a particle with rest mass) and so it is difficult to see independence  between the two even though they represent different components of a 4-vector. Similarly x’=vt’ for a particle with rest mass and one again does not have independence in trajectory even though one has the 4-vector (x,ct). </p> <p>   In order to see independence between E and p, we suggest that one must consider at least two particles with different rest masses, different E values, but the same p, hence yielding the same impulse hit. This, however, suggests two different moving frames, each with a different -v and not one. We ask: How does one introduce two frames in a natural manner? We suggest that if one considers two different rest masses mo1 and mo2 at rest, one has a total p of 0, each particle has equal and opposite momentum, but different energies and there is one frame. Using the notion of action-reaction, one may suggest that if mo1 and mo2 are joined  by a spring which is released, they may achieve equal and opposite momenta (linked to two different frames with -v1, -v2) and have different energies. The two have equal momenta, but different E values which, we argue, suggests independence of p and E. This may be verified by noting that the two are associated with independent measurements (impulse hits on a target versus distance traveled in a repulsive potential, as discussed in (1)).</p> <p>  Similarly, one may have the same E for two particles, but different momenta. In such a case, a different kind of measurement (distance traveled in a repulsive field) does not distinguish between the E values. We note that the action-reaction approach is directly connected with the concept of conservation of momentum. We argue that this reasoning suggests that E and p are independent even though Ev = p (c=1) for a particle with rest mass might suggest otherwise. As a result, -Edt+p dx, should have dt=hbar/E and dx=hbar/p in order to demonstrate such independence. Otherwise, there is a correlation between the two terms and they are not independent. </p> <p>  As a result, we argue that dt=hbar/E and dx=hbar/p, i.e. free particle quantum mechanical properties, are not only linked with the special relativistic Lorentz invariant -Et+px, but also with the notion of conservation of momentum and action-reaction. Even though one may use -Et+px for a single particle, the independence of E and p is really seen through considering at least two particles at rest with different masses which break apart with equal and opposite momenta.</p> <p> </p>
title Special Relativity, Action-Reaction and Free Particle Quantum Mechanics
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14639116