| _version_ | 1866901557499396096 |
|---|---|
| author | Khamboonruang, Pattrawan Prommi, Taeng-On |
| author_facet | Khamboonruang, Pattrawan Prommi, Taeng-On |
| contents | Figure 2. Images of some of the aquatic insects found in the rice fields (taken using a Leica EZ4E stereomicroscope and a built-in 5.0x MP High-Definition digital camera): Numbers 1-3, 24-25, 34, 41, and 43 were Odonata groups; numbers 4-11, 26, 30, and 33 were Coleoptera groups; numbers 12-21, 27, 31-32, and 45 were Hemiptera groups; numbers 22 and 42 were Ephemeroptera groups; and numbers 23, 28-29, 35-40, and 44 were Diptera groups. |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_14653382 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Figure 2 in Using aquatic insects as indicators of microplastic pollution in rice field ecosystems Khamboonruang, Pattrawan Prommi, Taeng-On Biodiversity Taxonomy Figure 2. Images of some of the aquatic insects found in the rice fields (taken using a Leica EZ4E stereomicroscope and a built-in 5.0x MP High-Definition digital camera): Numbers 1-3, 24-25, 34, 41, and 43 were Odonata groups; numbers 4-11, 26, 30, and 33 were Coleoptera groups; numbers 12-21, 27, 31-32, and 45 were Hemiptera groups; numbers 22 and 42 were Ephemeroptera groups; and numbers 23, 28-29, 35-40, and 44 were Diptera groups. |
| title | Figure 2 in Using aquatic insects as indicators of microplastic pollution in rice field ecosystems |
| topic | Biodiversity Taxonomy |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14653382 |