Figure 4 in Carbohydrate-based phenotyping of the green macroalga Ulva fasciata using near-infrared spectrometry: potential implications for marine biorefinery

Fuente: Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shefer, Shai, Israel, Alvaro, Golberg, Alexander, Chudnovsky, Alexandra
Format: Recurso digital
Published: Zenodo 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901801666609152
author Shefer, Shai
Israel, Alvaro
Golberg, Alexander
Chudnovsky, Alexandra
author_facet Shefer, Shai
Israel, Alvaro
Golberg, Alexander
Chudnovsky, Alexandra
contents Figure 4: (A) Measured (n = 16) vs. predicted glucose content (% of dry weight) for wet Ulva fasciata obtained for the best-fit model (second derivative of reflectance spectra when applied on selected wavelengths). (B) Partial least squares loadings vectors (LV1–3) for the optimal calibration model as calculated for glucose content using wet samples data set. (C) Score plot for the partial least squares best-fit model for glucose content using wet samples. Note the separation between samples with nutrient supply (denoted as wet 9–wet 16, located on the left side of the score plot) and those without nutrient supply (denoted as wet 1–wet 8, located on the right side of the plot) as evident from the score plot.
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_14669121
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2017
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Figure 4 in Carbohydrate-based phenotyping of the green macroalga Ulva fasciata using near-infrared spectrometry: potential implications for marine biorefinery
Shefer, Shai
Israel, Alvaro
Golberg, Alexander
Chudnovsky, Alexandra
Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Figure 4: (A) Measured (n = 16) vs. predicted glucose content (% of dry weight) for wet Ulva fasciata obtained for the best-fit model (second derivative of reflectance spectra when applied on selected wavelengths). (B) Partial least squares loadings vectors (LV1–3) for the optimal calibration model as calculated for glucose content using wet samples data set. (C) Score plot for the partial least squares best-fit model for glucose content using wet samples. Note the separation between samples with nutrient supply (denoted as wet 9–wet 16, located on the left side of the score plot) and those without nutrient supply (denoted as wet 1–wet 8, located on the right side of the plot) as evident from the score plot.
title Figure 4 in Carbohydrate-based phenotyping of the green macroalga Ulva fasciata using near-infrared spectrometry: potential implications for marine biorefinery
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14669121