Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14748315 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>Effective writing demands strategic language use for both communicative impact and structural accuracy. Cohesion is one of the keys to achieving these goals (Sutherland, 2015). This study investigates the use of cohesive devices in Pakistani and Native writers’ research article abstracts, identifying the different used types and their functions, using the framework of Halliday and Hassan (1976). To achieve this, 50 abstracts were collected from two prominent international research journals (25 from each) of ‘W’ categories, compiled into a corpus, and analyzed manually. The findings revealed differences in grammatical and lexical cohesive device usage between the two groups. Native writers frequently used reference, clausal ellipsis, reiteration, and collocation, while Pakistani writers' abstracts showed a higher frequency of conjunctions, nominal ellipsis, and verbal ellipsis. Consequently, the abstracts by Native writers exhibited greater interconnectedness and flow of ideas. The results indicated that Pakistani writers primarily organized their texts at a syntactic level, suggesting the need for organizing texts at a semantic level.</p>