Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Prades Vilar, Mario
Format: Recurso digital
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14762182
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901650529058816
author Prades Vilar, Mario
author_facet Prades Vilar, Mario
contents <p>Pedro de Ribadeneyra proposed in his Treatise on the Christian Prince (1595) four cases in which the Christian ruler can use the simulation without resorting to lies. This has been interpreted by traditional historiography as a trait of Machiavellianism, that is, a concession to the politic utilitas in spite of the alleged religious morality of<br>christian politics. The article examines carefully Ribadeneyra's theory having in mind the notion of "Machiavellianism of the Anti-Machiavellianists”, as proposed in a seminal article by José Antonio Maravall. The conclusion remarks that the alleged Machiavellianism of Ribadeneyra's theory could well be explained alluding to the casuistic doctrines of equivocation and mental reservation, represented in Ribadeneyra's work by Martin de Azpilcueta. Talking about the Machiavellianism of this kind of doctrine requires a better founded argument than the mere use of Maravall's authority</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_14762182
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2011
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle La teoría de la simulación de Pedro de Ribadeneyra y el 'maquiavelismo de los antimaquiavélicos'
Prades Vilar, Mario
Machiavellianism
Pedro de Ribadeneyra
Reason of State
political simulation
<p>Pedro de Ribadeneyra proposed in his Treatise on the Christian Prince (1595) four cases in which the Christian ruler can use the simulation without resorting to lies. This has been interpreted by traditional historiography as a trait of Machiavellianism, that is, a concession to the politic utilitas in spite of the alleged religious morality of<br>christian politics. The article examines carefully Ribadeneyra's theory having in mind the notion of "Machiavellianism of the Anti-Machiavellianists”, as proposed in a seminal article by José Antonio Maravall. The conclusion remarks that the alleged Machiavellianism of Ribadeneyra's theory could well be explained alluding to the casuistic doctrines of equivocation and mental reservation, represented in Ribadeneyra's work by Martin de Azpilcueta. Talking about the Machiavellianism of this kind of doctrine requires a better founded argument than the mere use of Maravall's authority</p>
title La teoría de la simulación de Pedro de Ribadeneyra y el 'maquiavelismo de los antimaquiavélicos'
topic Machiavellianism
Pedro de Ribadeneyra
Reason of State
political simulation
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14762182