Optimising Physical Training in DanceSport by Using HIIT Training and Smart Devices for Monitoring Physical Activity - Figure 10. The differences between averages – Motor Evaluation – Girls

Fuente: Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Monica Tania Gulap, Alin Cristian Roșa, Costinel Mihaiu
Format: Recurso digital
Veröffentlicht: Zenodo 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866901054003609600
author Monica Tania Gulap
Alin Cristian Roșa
Costinel Mihaiu
author_facet Monica Tania Gulap
Alin Cristian Roșa
Costinel Mihaiu
contents <p>The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test shows that between the experimental and control groups there are statistically significant differences in the final tests, the significance threshold p < 0.05, in all evaluations except the evaluation of Shuttle 10/5 m, for which the significance threshold p = 0.820 > 0.05. The effect size shows a large to very large difference between the results of the two groups (effect size > 0.50). <br>The differences between the averages of the two groups of girls at the final evaluations are shown in Figures no. 8, 9, 10.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_14769993
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2024
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Optimising Physical Training in DanceSport by Using HIIT Training and Smart Devices for Monitoring Physical Activity - Figure 10. The differences between averages – Motor Evaluation – Girls
Monica Tania Gulap
Alin Cristian Roșa
Costinel Mihaiu
dancesport
physical training
HIIT
Tabata
smart devices
<p>The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test shows that between the experimental and control groups there are statistically significant differences in the final tests, the significance threshold p < 0.05, in all evaluations except the evaluation of Shuttle 10/5 m, for which the significance threshold p = 0.820 > 0.05. The effect size shows a large to very large difference between the results of the two groups (effect size > 0.50). <br>The differences between the averages of the two groups of girls at the final evaluations are shown in Figures no. 8, 9, 10.</p>
title Optimising Physical Training in DanceSport by Using HIIT Training and Smart Devices for Monitoring Physical Activity - Figure 10. The differences between averages – Motor Evaluation – Girls
topic dancesport
physical training
HIIT
Tabata
smart devices
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14769993