Optimising Physical Training in DanceSport by Using HIIT Training and Smart Devices for Monitoring Physical Activity - Figure 12. The differences between averages – Technical Evaluation – Boys

Fuente: Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Monica Tania Gulap, Alin Cristian Roșa, Costinel Mihaiu
Format: Recurso digital
Veröffentlicht: Zenodo 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866901052746366976
author Monica Tania Gulap
Alin Cristian Roșa
Costinel Mihaiu
author_facet Monica Tania Gulap
Alin Cristian Roșa
Costinel Mihaiu
contents <p>The results of the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test are presented in the tables above and show that between the experimental and control groups of boys, there are statistically significant differences in the final tests,         p < 0.05, for all types of assessment, except for the Vertical Jump for which the value of the significance threshold p=0.063 > 0.05. The effect size indicates a large to very large difference between the results of the two groups of boys (effect size > 0.50)<br>Figures no. 11, 12, and 13 illustrate the differences between the averages of the two groups of boys at the final evaluations.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_14770073
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2024
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Optimising Physical Training in DanceSport by Using HIIT Training and Smart Devices for Monitoring Physical Activity - Figure 12. The differences between averages – Technical Evaluation – Boys
Monica Tania Gulap
Alin Cristian Roșa
Costinel Mihaiu
dancesport
physical training
HIIT
Tabata
smart devices
<p>The results of the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test are presented in the tables above and show that between the experimental and control groups of boys, there are statistically significant differences in the final tests,         p < 0.05, for all types of assessment, except for the Vertical Jump for which the value of the significance threshold p=0.063 > 0.05. The effect size indicates a large to very large difference between the results of the two groups of boys (effect size > 0.50)<br>Figures no. 11, 12, and 13 illustrate the differences between the averages of the two groups of boys at the final evaluations.</p>
title Optimising Physical Training in DanceSport by Using HIIT Training and Smart Devices for Monitoring Physical Activity - Figure 12. The differences between averages – Technical Evaluation – Boys
topic dancesport
physical training
HIIT
Tabata
smart devices
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14770073