Structure and roles in pollination networks between phyllostomid bats and flowers: a systematic review for the Americas

Fuente: Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: González-Gutiérrez, Kevin, Castaño, John Harold, Pérez-Torres, Jairo, Mosquera-Mosquera, Hilda Rocio
Format: Recurso digital
Published: Zenodo 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901362258739200
author González-Gutiérrez, Kevin
Castaño, John Harold
Pérez-Torres, Jairo
Mosquera-Mosquera, Hilda Rocio
author_facet González-Gutiérrez, Kevin
Castaño, John Harold
Pérez-Torres, Jairo
Mosquera-Mosquera, Hilda Rocio
contents (Uploaded by Plazi for the Bat Literature Project) The Phyllostomidae family contains specialists and facultative nectarivorous bats that visit hundreds of plants. Understanding the topology of bat–flower networks is fundamental to understand ecosystem functions. However, this mutualism has rarely been studied on a community-wide level. We applied network theory to analyze the bat–flower interactions in the Americas. We addressed three questions: what is the state of knowledge of the diet of nectarivorous phyllostomid bats? Are bat–flower interaction networks random or structured? Are specialized nectarivorous bats more central than facultative bats? We compiled information on bat–flower interactions in the Americas and built four matrices (Americas, South, CentralNorth, and Antilles). We calculated complementary specialization, nestedness, and quantitative modularity; and we assessed the functional role of bat and plant genera using two centrality metrics. We found 61 phyllostomid bat species that visited 277 flowering plant species. The most important bats were Glossophaga soricina, Leptonycteris yerbabuenae and Anoura geoffroyi. The most important plant species were Ceiba pentandra, Cordia alliodora and Pseudobombax ellipticum. Most networks were specialized, modular, and non-nested; however, in the Antilles the networks were nested, unspecialized, and not modular. The specialist bat genera Glossophaga and Anoura were the genera most central as hubs, and the facultative genera Phyllostomus and Artibeus were connectors. The plant genera Ceiba, Pseudobombax, Ochroma and Pilosocereus were central as connector hubs. Nectarivorous specialist bats demonstrate more interactions, maintaining the entire system; meanwhile facultative bats were connectors, binding different parts of the network. There are big information gaps on diet for many specialist nectarivorous, and the importance of facultative nectarivorous bats is probably larger than what is believed.
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_14818742
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2022
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Structure and roles in pollination networks between phyllostomid bats and flowers: a systematic review for the Americas
González-Gutiérrez, Kevin
Castaño, John Harold
Pérez-Torres, Jairo
Mosquera-Mosquera, Hilda Rocio
Biodiversity
Mammalia
Chiroptera
Chordata
Animalia
bats
bat
(Uploaded by Plazi for the Bat Literature Project) The Phyllostomidae family contains specialists and facultative nectarivorous bats that visit hundreds of plants. Understanding the topology of bat–flower networks is fundamental to understand ecosystem functions. However, this mutualism has rarely been studied on a community-wide level. We applied network theory to analyze the bat–flower interactions in the Americas. We addressed three questions: what is the state of knowledge of the diet of nectarivorous phyllostomid bats? Are bat–flower interaction networks random or structured? Are specialized nectarivorous bats more central than facultative bats? We compiled information on bat–flower interactions in the Americas and built four matrices (Americas, South, CentralNorth, and Antilles). We calculated complementary specialization, nestedness, and quantitative modularity; and we assessed the functional role of bat and plant genera using two centrality metrics. We found 61 phyllostomid bat species that visited 277 flowering plant species. The most important bats were Glossophaga soricina, Leptonycteris yerbabuenae and Anoura geoffroyi. The most important plant species were Ceiba pentandra, Cordia alliodora and Pseudobombax ellipticum. Most networks were specialized, modular, and non-nested; however, in the Antilles the networks were nested, unspecialized, and not modular. The specialist bat genera Glossophaga and Anoura were the genera most central as hubs, and the facultative genera Phyllostomus and Artibeus were connectors. The plant genera Ceiba, Pseudobombax, Ochroma and Pilosocereus were central as connector hubs. Nectarivorous specialist bats demonstrate more interactions, maintaining the entire system; meanwhile facultative bats were connectors, binding different parts of the network. There are big information gaps on diet for many specialist nectarivorous, and the importance of facultative nectarivorous bats is probably larger than what is believed.
title Structure and roles in pollination networks between phyllostomid bats and flowers: a systematic review for the Americas
topic Biodiversity
Mammalia
Chiroptera
Chordata
Animalia
bats
bat
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14818742