Assessing the palatability of different meats consumed in a biodiversity hotspot to inform alternative protein interventions

Fuente: Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emogor, Charles A., Ebri, Isa B., Atsu, Benedict A., Ogu, Dominic S., Iferi, Omini B., Balmford, Andrew
Format: Recurso digital
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901091441967104
author Emogor, Charles A.
Ebri, Isa B.
Atsu, Benedict A.
Ogu, Dominic S.
Iferi, Omini B.
Balmford, Andrew
author_facet Emogor, Charles A.
Ebri, Isa B.
Atsu, Benedict A.
Ogu, Dominic S.
Iferi, Omini B.
Balmford, Andrew
contents <p>Between August and September 2022, we interviewed 570 adult respondents (aged 18–80) from 15 communities surrounding Nigeria’s Cross River National Park to assess the palatability of solid animal-derived protein—domestic meat, fish, invertebrates, and wild meat. Respondents were categorized a priori into three groups: households (n = 190), hunters (n = 190), and vendors (individuals selling wild meat in markets and restaurants; n = 190). </p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_14897852
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Assessing the palatability of different meats consumed in a biodiversity hotspot to inform alternative protein interventions
Emogor, Charles A.
Ebri, Isa B.
Atsu, Benedict A.
Ogu, Dominic S.
Iferi, Omini B.
Balmford, Andrew
Alternative protein projects
Conservation intervention
Consumer preference
Meat palatability
Pangolins
Pholidota
Wild meat
<p>Between August and September 2022, we interviewed 570 adult respondents (aged 18–80) from 15 communities surrounding Nigeria’s Cross River National Park to assess the palatability of solid animal-derived protein—domestic meat, fish, invertebrates, and wild meat. Respondents were categorized a priori into three groups: households (n = 190), hunters (n = 190), and vendors (individuals selling wild meat in markets and restaurants; n = 190). </p>
title Assessing the palatability of different meats consumed in a biodiversity hotspot to inform alternative protein interventions
topic Alternative protein projects
Conservation intervention
Consumer preference
Meat palatability
Pangolins
Pholidota
Wild meat
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14897852