Euura nitidipleuris
Fuente:
Zenodo
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866902143764529152 |
|---|---|
| author | Prous, Marko Liston, Andrew Monckton, Spencer K. Kramp, Katja Vårdal, Hege Vikberg, Veli Heibo, Erik Mutanen, Marko |
| author_facet | Prous, Marko Liston, Andrew Monckton, Spencer K. Kramp, Katja Vårdal, Hege Vikberg, Veli Heibo, Erik Mutanen, Marko |
| contents | <p><b>289</b> <i>Euura nitidipleuris</i> (Malaise, 1931)</p><p>Figs 299, 521</p><p><i>Amauronematus nitidipleuris</i> Malaise, 1931b: 45. Lectotype designated below.</p><p><i>Amauronematus temporalis</i> Hellén, 1970: 34. <b>Syn. nov.</b></p><p><b>Diagnosis</b></p><p>Apically extensively pale abdomen but black tegula and pronotum, short valvula 3, strongly curved lancet with 16–18 annuli, and size (6.0–8.0 mm) should enable identification of the female. Male has pale sternum 9, black tegula and pronotum, and unique penis valve (1.5 mm, small valvispina, paravalva basally and apically similarly broad, broad apex of pseudoceps, small invagination between valvispina and broad and round lobe of paravalva). Penis valves of <i>E. acuminalis</i> and <i>E. annulata</i> are similar, but in addition to some differences in the shape of the paravalva (more elongate or basally narrower than apically), males of these species are extensively pale. When he compared <i>Amauronematus temporalis</i> with <i>nitidipleuris</i>, Hellén (1970) relied on Lindqvist (1945), who apparently misinterpreted <i>nitidipleuris</i>. According to Lindqvist’s drawing (1945: fig. 4), <i>nitidipleuris</i> has a straight lancet, but at least the lectotype has a curved lancet, as in the type of <i>temporalis</i>.</p><p>The COI sequence (458 bp) of the studied male (http://id.luomus.fi/GP.110187) is identical to a 130 bp fragment from the holotype of <i>temporalis</i>, and matches the sequenced larva rather well (1.09% different) and differs clearly from the other species by a minimum of 6.55%.</p><p><b>Type material examined</b></p><p><b>Lectotype <i>Amauronematus nitidipleuris</i></b>, here designated</p><p>RUSSIA – <b>Kamchatka oblast</b> • ♀; Klutchi [Klyuchi]; 56.32° N, 160.85° E; R. Malaise leg.; NHRS, NHRS-HEVA000006358.</p><p><b>Holotype <i>Amauronematus temporalis</i></b></p><p>FINLAND – <b>South Ostrobothnia</b> • ♀; Alavus; 19 May 1937; A. Saarinen leg.; MZH, http://id.luomus. fi/GL.2476.</p><p><b>Host plants</b></p><p>Unknown, but probably <i>Salix</i> like the other species in the group. Lindqvist (1953) reported two reared specimens from <i>Salix</i> (mentioned also by Kontuniemi 1960), but because he had apparently misinterpreted <i>nitidipleuris</i> earlier (Lindqvist 1945), the specimens might represent a different species in the group. The larva sequenced here was swept from a mixture of <i>Salix</i> and <i>Betula nana</i>.</p><p><b>Genetics</b></p><p><b>COI</b></p><p>Only one sequence (1087 bp) available, from a larva. The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 5.78%, is <i>Euura viduata</i>.</p><p><b>Nuclear</b></p><p>Only one sequence available, from a larva with haplotypes diverging by 0.21%. The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 1.15%, is <i>Euura erecta</i> (ZMUO.063230).</p><p><b>Distribution and material examined</b></p><p>Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, and Russia.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_15021171 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Euura nitidipleuris Prous, Marko Liston, Andrew Monckton, Spencer K. Kramp, Katja Vårdal, Hege Vikberg, Veli Heibo, Erik Mutanen, Marko Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hymenoptera Tenthredinidae Euura Euura nitidipleuris <p><b>289</b> <i>Euura nitidipleuris</i> (Malaise, 1931)</p><p>Figs 299, 521</p><p><i>Amauronematus nitidipleuris</i> Malaise, 1931b: 45. Lectotype designated below.</p><p><i>Amauronematus temporalis</i> Hellén, 1970: 34. <b>Syn. nov.</b></p><p><b>Diagnosis</b></p><p>Apically extensively pale abdomen but black tegula and pronotum, short valvula 3, strongly curved lancet with 16–18 annuli, and size (6.0–8.0 mm) should enable identification of the female. Male has pale sternum 9, black tegula and pronotum, and unique penis valve (1.5 mm, small valvispina, paravalva basally and apically similarly broad, broad apex of pseudoceps, small invagination between valvispina and broad and round lobe of paravalva). Penis valves of <i>E. acuminalis</i> and <i>E. annulata</i> are similar, but in addition to some differences in the shape of the paravalva (more elongate or basally narrower than apically), males of these species are extensively pale. When he compared <i>Amauronematus temporalis</i> with <i>nitidipleuris</i>, Hellén (1970) relied on Lindqvist (1945), who apparently misinterpreted <i>nitidipleuris</i>. According to Lindqvist’s drawing (1945: fig. 4), <i>nitidipleuris</i> has a straight lancet, but at least the lectotype has a curved lancet, as in the type of <i>temporalis</i>.</p><p>The COI sequence (458 bp) of the studied male (http://id.luomus.fi/GP.110187) is identical to a 130 bp fragment from the holotype of <i>temporalis</i>, and matches the sequenced larva rather well (1.09% different) and differs clearly from the other species by a minimum of 6.55%.</p><p><b>Type material examined</b></p><p><b>Lectotype <i>Amauronematus nitidipleuris</i></b>, here designated</p><p>RUSSIA – <b>Kamchatka oblast</b> • ♀; Klutchi [Klyuchi]; 56.32° N, 160.85° E; R. Malaise leg.; NHRS, NHRS-HEVA000006358.</p><p><b>Holotype <i>Amauronematus temporalis</i></b></p><p>FINLAND – <b>South Ostrobothnia</b> • ♀; Alavus; 19 May 1937; A. Saarinen leg.; MZH, http://id.luomus. fi/GL.2476.</p><p><b>Host plants</b></p><p>Unknown, but probably <i>Salix</i> like the other species in the group. Lindqvist (1953) reported two reared specimens from <i>Salix</i> (mentioned also by Kontuniemi 1960), but because he had apparently misinterpreted <i>nitidipleuris</i> earlier (Lindqvist 1945), the specimens might represent a different species in the group. The larva sequenced here was swept from a mixture of <i>Salix</i> and <i>Betula nana</i>.</p><p><b>Genetics</b></p><p><b>COI</b></p><p>Only one sequence (1087 bp) available, from a larva. The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 5.78%, is <i>Euura viduata</i>.</p><p><b>Nuclear</b></p><p>Only one sequence available, from a larva with haplotypes diverging by 0.21%. The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 1.15%, is <i>Euura erecta</i> (ZMUO.063230).</p><p><b>Distribution and material examined</b></p><p>Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, and Russia.</p> |
| title | Euura nitidipleuris |
| topic | Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hymenoptera Tenthredinidae Euura Euura nitidipleuris |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15021171 |