Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michalopoulos, Antonios Periklis, Paliodimos, Efstratios, Papadopoulos, Fotios, Nikolaou, Grigoris, Patrikakis, Charalampos, Mitilineos, Stylianos
Format: Recurso digital
Language:
Published: Zenodo 2025
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15032859
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866902338293202944
author Michalopoulos, Antonios Periklis
Paliodimos, Efstratios
Papadopoulos, Fotios
Nikolaou, Grigoris
Patrikakis, Charalampos
Mitilineos, Stylianos
author_facet Michalopoulos, Antonios Periklis
Paliodimos, Efstratios
Papadopoulos, Fotios
Nikolaou, Grigoris
Patrikakis, Charalampos
Mitilineos, Stylianos
contents <div> <h1>Project Description </h1> </div> <div> <p>During our research at the University of West Attica (UniWA), we addressed the problem of victim detection through walls in Search and Rescue (SAR) operations. To this end, we collected a dataset of radar signal recordings in a controlled classroom environment using a robotic system equipped with an ultra-wideband (UWB) pulsed radar. The collected data were then processed using various machine learning algorithms to detect a person behind a wall and to estimate its distance to the radar sensor. </p> </div> <div> <p>The experimental setup and the dataset acquisition methodology are thoroughly discussed in [1].</p> </div> <div> <div> <h1>Dataset Description </h1> </div> <div> <p>The dataset consists of 66 sessions of radar data corresponding to human presence. More specifically, data with six (6) victim actors were collected ("subjects"), across eleven (11) different, predefined robot positions, according to the setup described in [1]. Furthermore, 11 sessions of radar data were collected across the same robot positions, for human absence. Approximately 198 minutes of recorded human presence and 165 minutes of recorded absence are available, with a refresh rate of about 19 (radar) frames per second.</p> </div> <div> <div> <h1>Dataset Contents </h1> </div> <div> <div>Each subject folder is assigned an individual identifier Ni, where i=1...6 corresponds to subject number and N0 corresponds to subject absence. </div> <div>Within each subject folder, there are subfolders corresponding to the predefined robot positions as in [1], the subjects' orientation and distance to the wall. Within each subfolder, a CSV file stores a matrix of metadata and acquired radar data, according to the radar session data structure described in [1].</div> <div> <h1>Model Architecture</h1> </div> <div> <div>The explanation of the model architecture is presented in the file "CNN_Model.zip"</div> <div> </div> </div> </div> <div> <p>[1] Michalopoulos, A.-P et al, "Victim Detection Using a Robot-Mounted  UWB-Radar Platform", submitted in the 14th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST 2025)</p> </div> </div> </div>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_15032859
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Victim Detection Using a Robot-Mounted UWB-Radar Platform
Michalopoulos, Antonios Periklis
Paliodimos, Efstratios
Papadopoulos, Fotios
Nikolaou, Grigoris
Patrikakis, Charalampos
Mitilineos, Stylianos
<div> <h1>Project Description </h1> </div> <div> <p>During our research at the University of West Attica (UniWA), we addressed the problem of victim detection through walls in Search and Rescue (SAR) operations. To this end, we collected a dataset of radar signal recordings in a controlled classroom environment using a robotic system equipped with an ultra-wideband (UWB) pulsed radar. The collected data were then processed using various machine learning algorithms to detect a person behind a wall and to estimate its distance to the radar sensor. </p> </div> <div> <p>The experimental setup and the dataset acquisition methodology are thoroughly discussed in [1].</p> </div> <div> <div> <h1>Dataset Description </h1> </div> <div> <p>The dataset consists of 66 sessions of radar data corresponding to human presence. More specifically, data with six (6) victim actors were collected ("subjects"), across eleven (11) different, predefined robot positions, according to the setup described in [1]. Furthermore, 11 sessions of radar data were collected across the same robot positions, for human absence. Approximately 198 minutes of recorded human presence and 165 minutes of recorded absence are available, with a refresh rate of about 19 (radar) frames per second.</p> </div> <div> <div> <h1>Dataset Contents </h1> </div> <div> <div>Each subject folder is assigned an individual identifier Ni, where i=1...6 corresponds to subject number and N0 corresponds to subject absence. </div> <div>Within each subject folder, there are subfolders corresponding to the predefined robot positions as in [1], the subjects' orientation and distance to the wall. Within each subfolder, a CSV file stores a matrix of metadata and acquired radar data, according to the radar session data structure described in [1].</div> <div> <h1>Model Architecture</h1> </div> <div> <div>The explanation of the model architecture is presented in the file "CNN_Model.zip"</div> <div> </div> </div> </div> <div> <p>[1] Michalopoulos, A.-P et al, "Victim Detection Using a Robot-Mounted  UWB-Radar Platform", submitted in the 14th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST 2025)</p> </div> </div> </div>
title Victim Detection Using a Robot-Mounted UWB-Radar Platform
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15032859