DESCRIPTION OF THE TRUTH PARADOX
Fuente:
Zenodo
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Langue: | anglais |
| Publié: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866901501262168064 |
|---|---|
| author | Trần, Quốc Tiến |
| author_facet | Trần, Quốc Tiến |
| contents | <p>Truth—from “F=ma” to “I think, therefore I am”—always relies on something else: experimentation, senses, belief. The Truth Paradox is not an argument requiring proof but an evident principle: all knowledge exists within an indeterminate loop, never standing on its own. The purpose of this document is to illuminate this overarching principle—not to debate it, but to recognize how it governs science, philosophy, cognition, and everyday life.<br>Unlike skepticism, which rejects knowledge outright, the paradox does not deny knowledge but redefines it as an endless process, useful despite its indeterminacy.This upload includes both English and Vietnamese versions.</p> <p><strong>DESCRIPTION OF THE MOTION-TIME PARADOX <a name="_Hlk193205158"></a><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15043324" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15043324</span></a></strong></p> <p><strong>DESCRIPTION OF THE IMMEASURABILITY PARADOX </strong><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15043493" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15043493</strong></a></p> <p><strong>VÔ’S PARADOX SYSTEM</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15044184" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong> </strong>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15044184</a></p> <div>Contact: <a href="mailto:quockhanhsakamoto@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">quockhanhsakamoto@gmail.com</a>.</div> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_15043735 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | DESCRIPTION OF THE TRUTH PARADOX Trần, Quốc Tiến Truth Paradox Indeterminate Knowledge Epistemology Philosophy of Science Cognition Dependency Loop Uncertainty <p>Truth—from “F=ma” to “I think, therefore I am”—always relies on something else: experimentation, senses, belief. The Truth Paradox is not an argument requiring proof but an evident principle: all knowledge exists within an indeterminate loop, never standing on its own. The purpose of this document is to illuminate this overarching principle—not to debate it, but to recognize how it governs science, philosophy, cognition, and everyday life.<br>Unlike skepticism, which rejects knowledge outright, the paradox does not deny knowledge but redefines it as an endless process, useful despite its indeterminacy.This upload includes both English and Vietnamese versions.</p> <p><strong>DESCRIPTION OF THE MOTION-TIME PARADOX <a name="_Hlk193205158"></a><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15043324" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15043324</span></a></strong></p> <p><strong>DESCRIPTION OF THE IMMEASURABILITY PARADOX </strong><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15043493" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15043493</strong></a></p> <p><strong>VÔ’S PARADOX SYSTEM</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15044184" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong> </strong>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15044184</a></p> <div>Contact: <a href="mailto:quockhanhsakamoto@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">quockhanhsakamoto@gmail.com</a>.</div> |
| title | DESCRIPTION OF THE TRUTH PARADOX |
| topic | Truth Paradox Indeterminate Knowledge Epistemology Philosophy of Science Cognition Dependency Loop Uncertainty |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15043735 |