Armature formula of P 1 – P 5 as follows: in Proposal of new genera and species of the subfamily Diosaccinae (Copepoda: Harpacticoida: Miraciidae)
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2021
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901156809146368 |
|---|---|
| author | Gómez, Samuel Corgosinho, Paulo Henrique Costa Rivera-Sánchez, Karen I. |
| author_facet | Gómez, Samuel Corgosinho, Paulo Henrique Costa Rivera-Sánchez, Karen I. |
| contents | <p>Armature formula of P1–P5 as follows:</p><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>EXP</th><th>ENP/ENP lobe</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>P1</th><td>0-1-0,2,3</td><td>1-1-1,1,1</td></tr><tr><th>P2</th><td>1-1-1(0),2,3</td><td>♀ 1-2-1,2,1 / ♂ dimorphic</td></tr><tr><th>P3</th><td>1-1-1(0),2,3</td><td>1-1-2(1),2,1</td></tr><tr><th>P4</th><td>1-1-2(0,3),2,3</td><td>1-1(0) 2 -2(1),2,1</td></tr><tr><th>P 5 ♀ / ♂</th><td>♀ 4– 61 / ♂ 4–6</td><td>♀ 4–5 / ♂ 2</td></tr></tbody></table><p><sup>1</sup> The report of eight setae on the female P5 EXP of <i>T. blanchardi</i> is most probably erroneous. <sup>2</sup> <i>Typhlamphiascus typhlops</i> is known to lack inner armature on the P4 ENP2. The inner seta of P4 ENP2 of <i>T. capensis</i> comb. nov. might have become detached from the supporting segment as indicated by the interrupted cuticle (Kunz 1975).</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_15135173 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Armature formula of P 1 – P 5 as follows: in Proposal of new genera and species of the subfamily Diosaccinae (Copepoda: Harpacticoida: Miraciidae) Gómez, Samuel Corgosinho, Paulo Henrique Costa Rivera-Sánchez, Karen I. Biodiversity Taxonomy <p>Armature formula of P1–P5 as follows:</p><table><thead><tr><th></th><th>EXP</th><th>ENP/ENP lobe</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>P1</th><td>0-1-0,2,3</td><td>1-1-1,1,1</td></tr><tr><th>P2</th><td>1-1-1(0),2,3</td><td>♀ 1-2-1,2,1 / ♂ dimorphic</td></tr><tr><th>P3</th><td>1-1-1(0),2,3</td><td>1-1-2(1),2,1</td></tr><tr><th>P4</th><td>1-1-2(0,3),2,3</td><td>1-1(0) 2 -2(1),2,1</td></tr><tr><th>P 5 ♀ / ♂</th><td>♀ 4– 61 / ♂ 4–6</td><td>♀ 4–5 / ♂ 2</td></tr></tbody></table><p><sup>1</sup> The report of eight setae on the female P5 EXP of <i>T. blanchardi</i> is most probably erroneous. <sup>2</sup> <i>Typhlamphiascus typhlops</i> is known to lack inner armature on the P4 ENP2. The inner seta of P4 ENP2 of <i>T. capensis</i> comb. nov. might have become detached from the supporting segment as indicated by the interrupted cuticle (Kunz 1975).</p> |
| title | Armature formula of P 1 – P 5 as follows: in Proposal of new genera and species of the subfamily Diosaccinae (Copepoda: Harpacticoida: Miraciidae) |
| topic | Biodiversity Taxonomy |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15135173 |