Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15139955 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p><b>Table 2</b> Characteristics of the phylogenetic data. ’PI" indicates characters that are phylogenetically informative.</p><table><thead><tr><th></th><th colspan="2"><b>ITS</b></th><th colspan="2"><i>trn L-F</i></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th></th><td>ITS DNA</td><td>ITS indels</td><td><i>trn</i> L-F DNA</td><td><i>trn</i> L-F indels</td><td>TOTAL / average:</td></tr><tr><th>Aligned length (bp)</th><td>677</td><td>56</td><td>805</td><td>45</td><td>1601 / 320</td></tr><tr><th>No. PI characters</th><td>200</td><td>20</td><td>85</td><td>29</td><td>351 / 70</td></tr><tr><th>% PI characters</th><td>29.5</td><td>35.7</td><td>10.6</td><td>64.4</td><td>46.9 / 9.4</td></tr><tr><th>No. (and percentage) of Calenduleae species represented</th><td>35 (30.2%)</td><td></td><td>31 (26.7%)</td><td></td><td>37 / 34</td></tr><tr><th>No. (and percentage) of <i>Garuleum</i> species represented Ɨ</th><td>5 (62.5%)</td><td></td><td>5 (62.5%)</td><td></td><td>5 / 5</td></tr><tr><th>No. (and percentage) of <i>Dimorphotheca</i> species represented Ƨ</th><td>7 (35%)</td><td></td><td>3 (15%)</td><td></td><td>7 / 6</td></tr><tr><th>No. (and percentage) of <i>Osteospermum</i> species represented*</th><td>23 (26.1%)</td><td></td><td>23 (26.1%)</td><td></td><td>25 / 24</td></tr></tbody></table><p><sup>Ɨ</sup> <i>Garuleum</i> comprises 8 species, according to Swelankomo (2013).</p><p><sup>Ƨ</sup> <i>Dimorphotheca</i> comprises 20 species, according to Nordenstam (1994a) and Nordenstam (2006).</p><p>* <i>Osteospermum</i> comprises 88 species, including 15 species in <i>O</i>. sect. <i>Calendula</i>, according to a literature survey; species in <i>O</i>. sect. <i>Calendula</i> according to Meikle (1976).</p>