Melitaea phoebe subsp. ogygia Fruhstorfer 1908
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2020
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866902035049218048 |
|---|---|
| author | Russell, P. J. C. Bartolozzi, L. Hawkins, R. L. Tennent, W. J. Léger, T. |
| author_facet | Russell, P. J. C. Bartolozzi, L. Hawkins, R. L. Tennent, W. J. Léger, T. |
| contents | <p><i>Melitaea phoebe ogygia postogygia</i> Verity, 1938</p><p>[TL: uncertain - three syntypes from two different localities in Greece: Salonica (= Thessalonica), Macedonia @ 1000 ft. (= <i>circa</i> 300 m) and Olympus, bordering Thessaly/Macedonia @ 2500 ft. (= <i>circa</i> 750 m)]. Although the name <i>postogygia</i> has no formal nomenclatural standing as part of a quadrinomial, it is considered here because of its association with the names <i>ogygia</i> and <i>nigrogygia</i>, which are associated with <i>M. ornata</i> (cf above, and RUSSELL & BARTOLOZZI, 2019). Verity’s description (1938: (16)) indicated that the name was proposed for a second generation of “ <i>M. phoebe ogygia</i> ”. This is unusual: <i>M. ornata</i> is generally univoltine (RUSSELL & PATEMAN, 2011), although second generations occur when rearing the species in the U.K., if the larvae are exposed to very wet conditions (RUSSELL & PATEMAN, 2013).</p><p>Examination of the photographs of the three syntypes and their associated labels revealed that the two syntypic males from Salonica, taken 12 and 13 August 1936 are almost certainly <i>M. ornata</i> (Figs 16a, b, c); whereas a female from Olympus taken on “Aug[ust]. 17, 1935”, is <i>M. phoebe</i> (Figs 17a, b & c). All three specimens were captured by Romei. These identifications, admittedly based only on antenna and wing morphology, were agreed by John Coutsis and Jim Pateman. (See Acknowledgements). The designation of a lectotype in this case is not relevant because the name <i>postogygia</i> is part of a quadrinomial (infrasubspecific) and thus not nomenclaturally significant.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_15237504 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Melitaea phoebe subsp. ogygia Fruhstorfer 1908 Russell, P. J. C. Bartolozzi, L. Hawkins, R. L. Tennent, W. J. Léger, T. Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Nymphalidae Melitaea Melitaea phoebe Melitaea phoebe ogygia postogygia verity, 1938 <p><i>Melitaea phoebe ogygia postogygia</i> Verity, 1938</p><p>[TL: uncertain - three syntypes from two different localities in Greece: Salonica (= Thessalonica), Macedonia @ 1000 ft. (= <i>circa</i> 300 m) and Olympus, bordering Thessaly/Macedonia @ 2500 ft. (= <i>circa</i> 750 m)]. Although the name <i>postogygia</i> has no formal nomenclatural standing as part of a quadrinomial, it is considered here because of its association with the names <i>ogygia</i> and <i>nigrogygia</i>, which are associated with <i>M. ornata</i> (cf above, and RUSSELL & BARTOLOZZI, 2019). Verity’s description (1938: (16)) indicated that the name was proposed for a second generation of “ <i>M. phoebe ogygia</i> ”. This is unusual: <i>M. ornata</i> is generally univoltine (RUSSELL & PATEMAN, 2011), although second generations occur when rearing the species in the U.K., if the larvae are exposed to very wet conditions (RUSSELL & PATEMAN, 2013).</p><p>Examination of the photographs of the three syntypes and their associated labels revealed that the two syntypic males from Salonica, taken 12 and 13 August 1936 are almost certainly <i>M. ornata</i> (Figs 16a, b, c); whereas a female from Olympus taken on “Aug[ust]. 17, 1935”, is <i>M. phoebe</i> (Figs 17a, b & c). All three specimens were captured by Romei. These identifications, admittedly based only on antenna and wing morphology, were agreed by John Coutsis and Jim Pateman. (See Acknowledgements). The designation of a lectotype in this case is not relevant because the name <i>postogygia</i> is part of a quadrinomial (infrasubspecific) and thus not nomenclaturally significant.</p> |
| title | Melitaea phoebe subsp. ogygia Fruhstorfer 1908 |
| topic | Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Nymphalidae Melitaea Melitaea phoebe Melitaea phoebe ogygia postogygia verity, 1938 |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15237504 |