Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15290151 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Collaboration among research, business and government is critical to innovation in Australia. It drives improvements to productivity, economic growth, quality of living and planet health, and enables us to address some of the most pressing problems facing society, like healthcare and medicine, and food security. For that reason, there has been significant government investment to support translational research and reshape the research and innovation landscape. Successful collaborations start with connecting with the right collaborators and resources. But currently, there's no easy way for Australian businesses, policymakers and citizens to discover and access research expertise, findings and products. Similarly, there's no simple way for researchers to identify research and development opportunities in business. The Research Link Australia (RLA) project is developing a strategy framework and a technical platform to bridge this information gap. By making research capability, business opportunities and government initiatives more discoverable, the platform will increase the linking opportunities for business, government and research, and accelerate other initiatives that seek to support and facilitate collaborations. RLA is supported by the Australian Research Data Commons. The project has adopted a consultative and co-design approach, by engaging and working with government bodies, key data agencies, research-industry facilitators, businesses and research communities to ensure we develop and iteratively improve these capabilities together. This presentation will introduce the project and the project approach, discuss and get feedback on: 1) the strategic framework, service model and informatics standards for improving information quality and linkage, and 2) identified gaps for further consultation and project development.