Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15301322 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>Species co-existence is based on resource partitioning and modulates biodiversity patterns across climates, latitudes, and altitudes. Resource partitioning can occur via niche size or separation in the geographic range or ecological niche. While resource partitioning promotes biodiversity, the impact of different partitioning strategies on species richness remains largely unexplored. Study locations: two ecosystems with similar climates and ages, the species-rich tropical alpine ecosystem in the South American Andes and the more species-poor tropical alpine ecosystem in the eastern African mountains. Study time period: present-day distribution and climatic conditions, integrating phylogenetic information extending back to the last 7 million years maximum. Major taxa studied: Six lineages from the Asterales; three in each ecosystem, respectively. We test whether geographic range and climatic niche partitioning strategies may explain differences in species richness between the two ecosystems. We combine phylogenomic data with occurrence records and estimate metrics of size and overlap for climatic niche and geographic range. We show that the Andean species have larger climatic niches than the African species, suggesting that niche size is not explaining higher species richness in the Andes. Instead, a striking pattern for species with overlapping geographic ranges emerged: the Andean species show less climatic niche overlap than the African species, indicating more effective niche separation among Andean species. We hypothesise that a different pattern of resource partitioning, specifically increased niche separation among geographically overlapping species in the Andes compared to the eastern African mountains, contribute to the species richness difference between these tropical alpine biodiversity hotspots.</p>