Parsing of contradictions and anti–dumping measures regarding subsidies to agricultural enterprises against WTO legislation
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Lingua: | ucraino |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901472344539136 |
|---|---|
| author | Vitaliy Krupskyi |
| author_facet | Vitaliy Krupskyi |
| contents | <p>The subject of the study is the parsing of contradictions and anti–dumping measures regarding<br>subsidies to agricultural enterprises against WTO legislation.<br>The purpose of the study is to determine the features and tools for considering contradictions<br>and anti–dumping measures regarding subsidies to agricultural enterprises against WTO legislation.</p> <p>Research methods. The article uses the dialectical method of scientific knowledge, the method of<br>analysis and synthesis, the comparative method, and the method of data generalization.<br>Results of the work. The article analyzes the contradictions that arise when applying anti–<br>dumping and countervailing measures to agricultural products that receive state subsidies, from the<br>point of view of compliance with the norms of the World Trade Organization (WTO). It is studied how<br>national legislation aimed at protecting the domestic market from dumped imports clashes with WTO<br>rules on subsidizing agriculture. Special attention is paid to the classification of subsidies (green box,<br>yellow box, blue box) and their impact on the possibility of applying anti–dumping duties. Cases are<br>analyzed when anti–dumping measures actually eliminate WTO–allowed subsidies, creating unequal<br>conditions of competition, and ways to resolve these contradictions are considered.<br>The purpose of the study is to determine ways to ensure fair trade in agricultural products and<br>avoid abuse of anti–dumping measures.<br>Conclusions. Anti–dumping and countervailing measures applied to agricultural enterprises cause<br>significant controversy in the context of WTO law. Subsidies to the agricultural sector, common in<br>many countries, often become the subject of anti–dumping investigations and countervailing duties.<br>The problem lies in the complexity of determining a «fair» price and proving the fact of dumping or<br>the presence of harmful subsidies. WTO agreements contain positions that allow the application of<br>such measures, but their interpretation and application often cause disagreements. Controversies<br>arise around the methods of calculating the dumping margin and the volume of subsidies, as well<br>as determining the cause and effect link between imports and the injury caused to local producers.<br>Opacity in the application of methodologies and political pressure can lead to the abuse of these<br>instruments, violating the principles of free trade defined in the WTO. Resolving these contradictions<br>requires increased transparency and the development of clear, internationally agreed rules.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_15316283 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | ukr |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Parsing of contradictions and anti–dumping measures regarding subsidies to agricultural enterprises against WTO legislation Vitaliy Krupskyi dumping subsidies agricultural enterprises legislation World Trade Organization production integration liberalization anti–dumping investigation mechanism <p>The subject of the study is the parsing of contradictions and anti–dumping measures regarding<br>subsidies to agricultural enterprises against WTO legislation.<br>The purpose of the study is to determine the features and tools for considering contradictions<br>and anti–dumping measures regarding subsidies to agricultural enterprises against WTO legislation.</p> <p>Research methods. The article uses the dialectical method of scientific knowledge, the method of<br>analysis and synthesis, the comparative method, and the method of data generalization.<br>Results of the work. The article analyzes the contradictions that arise when applying anti–<br>dumping and countervailing measures to agricultural products that receive state subsidies, from the<br>point of view of compliance with the norms of the World Trade Organization (WTO). It is studied how<br>national legislation aimed at protecting the domestic market from dumped imports clashes with WTO<br>rules on subsidizing agriculture. Special attention is paid to the classification of subsidies (green box,<br>yellow box, blue box) and their impact on the possibility of applying anti–dumping duties. Cases are<br>analyzed when anti–dumping measures actually eliminate WTO–allowed subsidies, creating unequal<br>conditions of competition, and ways to resolve these contradictions are considered.<br>The purpose of the study is to determine ways to ensure fair trade in agricultural products and<br>avoid abuse of anti–dumping measures.<br>Conclusions. Anti–dumping and countervailing measures applied to agricultural enterprises cause<br>significant controversy in the context of WTO law. Subsidies to the agricultural sector, common in<br>many countries, often become the subject of anti–dumping investigations and countervailing duties.<br>The problem lies in the complexity of determining a «fair» price and proving the fact of dumping or<br>the presence of harmful subsidies. WTO agreements contain positions that allow the application of<br>such measures, but their interpretation and application often cause disagreements. Controversies<br>arise around the methods of calculating the dumping margin and the volume of subsidies, as well<br>as determining the cause and effect link between imports and the injury caused to local producers.<br>Opacity in the application of methodologies and political pressure can lead to the abuse of these<br>instruments, violating the principles of free trade defined in the WTO. Resolving these contradictions<br>requires increased transparency and the development of clear, internationally agreed rules.</p> |
| title | Parsing of contradictions and anti–dumping measures regarding subsidies to agricultural enterprises against WTO legislation |
| topic | dumping subsidies agricultural enterprises legislation World Trade Organization production integration liberalization anti–dumping investigation mechanism |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15316283 |