Celonites semenovi Kostylev 1935

Fuente: Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Fateryga, Alexander V.
Format: Recurso digital
Veröffentlicht: Zenodo 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866902010183286784
author Fateryga, Alexander V.
author_facet Fateryga, Alexander V.
contents <p><b><i>Celonites semenovi</i> Kostylev</b></p><p>(Fig. 13)</p><p><i>Celonites semenovi</i> Kostylev, 1935: 112, [♀] (type locality: “ПерсиЯ” [Iran]).</p><p><b>Type material. LECTOTYPE (DESIGNATED HERE): ♀, labeled “[golden disc] // Керман: стр. Мекран. [Kerman: Makran] / 14–18.III.1901 / <i>Н. ЗарУдный.</i> [N. Zarudny] // Coll. <i>Semenov-Tian-Shansky</i> // <i>Celonites</i> ♀ / <i>semenovi</i>. Typ / G. Kostylev det. 1932 // Lectotype ♀ / <i>Celonites semenovi</i> / Kostylev, 1935 / des. Fateryga, 2024 [red label] // Zoological Institute / St. Petersburg / INS_HYM_0000327 [pale yellow label]” [ZISP]</b>.</p><p><b>Current status.</b> Valid (Carpenter 2001). Senior synonym of <i>Celonites pictus rufiventris</i> Gusenleitner, 1992, <b>syn. nov.</b></p><p><b>Remarks.</b> Kostylev (1935) did not indicate any material examined. Therefore, the only available specimen with his identification label is designated here as the lectotype. The lectotype is lacking some legs. Photographs of the holotype of <i>C. pictus rufiventris</i> (ZOBODAT 2025b), described from Iran, were examined along with its original description (Gusenleitner 1992); it fits the lectotype of <i>C. semenovi</i> except that <i>C. pictus rufiventris</i> has a somewhat richer orange pattern. The taxonomic status of <i>C. pictus pictus</i> Richards, 1962 described from Senegal remains unclear. Two females from Morocco were examined and no evident structural differences from <i>C. semenovi</i> were revealed (both females had a coloration similar to that of the lectotype of <i>C. semenovi</i>, i.e., slightly less extensive orange patter than that in the holotype of <i>C. pictus rufiventris</i>). However, according to Volker Mauss (personal communication), there is a valuable difference in the COI-5P sequences between a specimen of <i>C. pictus</i> from Morocco (Fateryga <i>et al.</i> 2023a) and three specimens from the Arabian Peninsula (Schmid-Egger 2017). Males from the eastern populations (unavailable in the present study) should be compared with those from northern Africa. Until this is done, <i>C. pictus</i> is provisionally continued to be treated as a separate species closely related to <i>C. semenovi</i>.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_15427602
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Celonites semenovi Kostylev 1935
Fateryga, Alexander V.
Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hymenoptera
Masaridae
Celonites
Celonites semenovi
<p><b><i>Celonites semenovi</i> Kostylev</b></p><p>(Fig. 13)</p><p><i>Celonites semenovi</i> Kostylev, 1935: 112, [♀] (type locality: “ПерсиЯ” [Iran]).</p><p><b>Type material. LECTOTYPE (DESIGNATED HERE): ♀, labeled “[golden disc] // Керман: стр. Мекран. [Kerman: Makran] / 14–18.III.1901 / <i>Н. ЗарУдный.</i> [N. Zarudny] // Coll. <i>Semenov-Tian-Shansky</i> // <i>Celonites</i> ♀ / <i>semenovi</i>. Typ / G. Kostylev det. 1932 // Lectotype ♀ / <i>Celonites semenovi</i> / Kostylev, 1935 / des. Fateryga, 2024 [red label] // Zoological Institute / St. Petersburg / INS_HYM_0000327 [pale yellow label]” [ZISP]</b>.</p><p><b>Current status.</b> Valid (Carpenter 2001). Senior synonym of <i>Celonites pictus rufiventris</i> Gusenleitner, 1992, <b>syn. nov.</b></p><p><b>Remarks.</b> Kostylev (1935) did not indicate any material examined. Therefore, the only available specimen with his identification label is designated here as the lectotype. The lectotype is lacking some legs. Photographs of the holotype of <i>C. pictus rufiventris</i> (ZOBODAT 2025b), described from Iran, were examined along with its original description (Gusenleitner 1992); it fits the lectotype of <i>C. semenovi</i> except that <i>C. pictus rufiventris</i> has a somewhat richer orange pattern. The taxonomic status of <i>C. pictus pictus</i> Richards, 1962 described from Senegal remains unclear. Two females from Morocco were examined and no evident structural differences from <i>C. semenovi</i> were revealed (both females had a coloration similar to that of the lectotype of <i>C. semenovi</i>, i.e., slightly less extensive orange patter than that in the holotype of <i>C. pictus rufiventris</i>). However, according to Volker Mauss (personal communication), there is a valuable difference in the COI-5P sequences between a specimen of <i>C. pictus</i> from Morocco (Fateryga <i>et al.</i> 2023a) and three specimens from the Arabian Peninsula (Schmid-Egger 2017). Males from the eastern populations (unavailable in the present study) should be compared with those from northern Africa. Until this is done, <i>C. pictus</i> is provisionally continued to be treated as a separate species closely related to <i>C. semenovi</i>.</p>
title Celonites semenovi Kostylev 1935
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hymenoptera
Masaridae
Celonites
Celonites semenovi
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15427602