Skip to content
Descubridor Institucional UMAR
Inicio
Búsqueda avanzada
Explorar
Inicio
Búsqueda avanzada
Explorar
Login
Language
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
All Fields
Title
Author
Subject
Call Number
ISBN/ISSN
Tag
Find
Advanced
Formal Proof of Hume's Is–Ought Gap via the Theory of Ontological Conflicts (TOC)
Formal Proof of Hume's Is–Ought Gap via the Theory of Ontological Conflicts (TOC)
Fuente:
Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author:
Ednyashev, Sanal
Format:
Recurso digital
Published:
Zenodo
2025
Online Access:
Acceder al recurso
Tags:
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Cite this
Text this
Email this
Print
Export Record
Export to RefWorks
Export to EndNoteWeb
Export to EndNote
Save to List
Permanent link
Holdings
Description
Comments
Similar Items
Staff View
Internet
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15513894
Similar Items
The Code Theory: A Formal Ontology of Subjectivity, Meaning, and Divergence
by: Ednyashev, Sanal
Published: (2025)
Formal Emergence of Self in ∂-Conflict Systems
by: Ednyashev, Sanal
Published: (2025)
Theorem of Consciousness 6: Formal Ontology of the Differentiating Subject
by: Ednyashev, Sanal
Published: (2025)
A Formal Proof of the Hodge Conjecture Using Chaos-Inspired Dynamics
by: Ednyashev, Sanal
Published: (2025)
A Spectral Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis Formalized in Lean
by: Ednyashev, Sanal, et al.
Published: (2025)