A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TRADITIONAL AND INTEGRATIVE APPROACHES IN EFL TEACHER TRAINING

Fuente: Zenodo
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ashurova Zulaykho Kholdaralievna
Formato: Recurso digital
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: Zenodo 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866902067737526272
author Ashurova Zulaykho Kholdaralievna
author_facet Ashurova Zulaykho Kholdaralievna
contents <p>This article presents a comparative analysis of traditional and integrative approaches in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teacher training, with a particular focus on the development of oral communication competence. Traditional methods, often characterized by grammar-translation techniques and lecture-based instruction, are contrasted with integrative models that emphasize communicative competence, task-based learning, and interdisciplinary content.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_15626183
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TRADITIONAL AND INTEGRATIVE APPROACHES IN EFL TEACHER TRAINING
Ashurova Zulaykho Kholdaralievna
EFL, teacher training, traditional method, integrative approach, communicative competence, task-based learning, curriculum reform.
<p>This article presents a comparative analysis of traditional and integrative approaches in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teacher training, with a particular focus on the development of oral communication competence. Traditional methods, often characterized by grammar-translation techniques and lecture-based instruction, are contrasted with integrative models that emphasize communicative competence, task-based learning, and interdisciplinary content.</p>
title A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TRADITIONAL AND INTEGRATIVE APPROACHES IN EFL TEACHER TRAINING
topic EFL, teacher training, traditional method, integrative approach, communicative competence, task-based learning, curriculum reform.
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15626183